Risk assets rallied in October after months of negative returns. Stocks posted their best October return since 2015 and high yield bonds rallied 3% as spreads tightened. Buoyed by $60 billion of inflows into equity ETFs, total flows surpassed $90 billion in October. Meanwhile, bond flows were their fifth-most ever (+$27 billion), fueled by a resurgence in high yield flows (+$7 billion, second-most ever).
October is full of surprises. A World Series pretender turns into a contender. Kids try their best Michael Myers impressions on unsuspecting adults. And of course, Instagram like-inducing posts of fall foliage mean hours of blister-producing raking that your instafriends never see.
This October doled out a fresh surprise to investors. Risk assets rallied after months of Federal Reserve rate hike fueled negativity. Global equities posted their best October return since 2015 and their best overall monthly return since this past July.1
This rally was a welcome sight. Yet, is this rally more like the sixth grader dressed in the Guy Fawkes costume ready to egg your house the minute you shut off the front light at 8 PM (i.e., the tricker) or the sweet second grader living her best Elsa life asking for just one more Kit-Kat (i.e., the treater)?
Signs point to this rally being slightly more durable than the one in July, as heavily shorted stocks (i.e., a short cover rally) didn’t bounce higher in October. Another indicator is the buying behavior this time around.
Back in July, ETFs had only $35 billion of inflows. In October, however, sentiment surprised to the upside with ETFs taking in $90 billion. Yet, not all areas thrived.
Following months of below-average flows, ETFs surprised to the upside in October with $90 billion of inflows. Equity flows drove the topline figures, taking in $64 billion in October. Funds focused on the US were the primary allocation, taking in $55 billion.
For all ETFs, this is the sixth-most flows ever for ETFs and pushed total flows to over $500 billion for the year. In fact, as shown below, the flows in 2022 are now the second-most ever — surpassing the prior second place record of $503 billion in 2020. This is also now the third consecutive year with flows over $500 billion.
So far in 2022, even with the significant volatility, flows averaged $48 billion a month. Historically, November and December have averaged a combined $120 billion of inflows. Apply these two averages into an ensemble forecast, and ETFs could conceivably witness inflows of $110 billion over the next two months. This would put forecasted full-year flows at $620 billion.
Flows go over $500 billion for the year
While the notional total flow figures for October were impressive, the beneath-the-surface trends were not overly robust. Similar to prior months of below median participation, only 54% of funds had inflows (versus a historical 63% rate).
The lack of depth extended across all major categories, as not one segment was above its historical median. And in the prior five instances when flows were over $90 billion in a single month, the participation rate averaged 67%. Overall, the below median participation rate supports the trepidation toward the vibrancy of the headline buying behavior.
Following their worst month of outflows ever in September (-$9.9 billion), sector funds rebounded in October with their ninth-best month ever – taking in $7.6 billion. This pushed full-year sector flows positive once again. Nine out of the 11 sectors had inflows in October, a reversal of the year-long trend as only five sectors have net inflows year-to-date. The flows and depth are a good sign of risk-taking.
Technology led all sectors in October with $3 billion of inflows while cyclicals (+$3.3 billion) outpaced defensives (+$600 million). Yet, the latter, led by $1.4 billion into Health Care, posted a record 12th consecutive month of inflows — underscoring the preference for defense in 2022.
Value funds surpassed growth exposures for the third straight month, taking in $11.6 billion in October – their sixth-largest inflow ever. This pushed full-year value flows to $94 billion, a new annual flow record. With growth flows at just $17 billion, the differential between the two styles is at its widest ever ($77 billion) for a calendar year. Given the strong performance of value over growth last month (+5%) and year to date (+25%), these flow trends are not a surprise.2
Out of the $11.6 billion into value, $3.5 billion came from inflows into dividend funds, as they fall into the traditional value category. October was dividend funds’ 27th month in a row with inflows, three months shy of their record streak.
Dividend funds year-to-date total is now over $60 billion. This is the most ever for a calendar year, with two months left to go. These flows have also helped propel Smart Beta funds to a record annual flow total.
High yield also had positive returns in October, rallying by 3% as spreads tightened by 88 basis points (bps) on the month.3 The strong rally brought buyers back, as high yield ETFs posted their second- most flows ever (+$7 billion).
This was also just their third month of inflows this year, a significant sign of a reversal. Total 2022 flows for high yield exposures remain in net outflows (-$8 billion), however. Yet, they are no longer the worst ever, as they are now just narrowly better than the -$9.5 billion from 2019.
Given that spreads have compressed so quickly — 36 of the 88 bps decline came in the last week and spreads are now 10% below their long-term average — a repeat of the robust buying behavior next month may be hard to come by.4
The $27 billion into bond funds in October was fueled by other segments as well, as nine out of 11 bond sectors had inflows last month. This is a departure from the year-to-date trend, as only four sectors have net inflows in 2022. Despite the low depth this year, bond flows are already at their third-most ever for a year (+$153 billion). Yet, they are unlikely to break $200 billion for the third straight year, unless there is repeat of October’s performance in each of the next two months.
Fixed Income Sector Flows
The foundations remain somewhat uncertain. Earnings sentiment continues to wane as revisions push full-year 2022 and 2023 estimates lower.5 Economic data are sluggish and geopolitical tensions remain high. And 2022 is forecasted to be the Federal Reserve’s most aggressive calendar year ever.6
Of course, surprises are usually fleeting. Therefore, like the angst-provoking Halloween calculation that each kid will “just take one,” investors should be filled with a bit of trepidation heading into the final months of the year.
Leaning into what has worked so far this year — high quality/value and ultra-short bonds — may mitigate the pain of any October surprise reversal and help you get portfolios to 2023.
1 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of October 31, 2022 based on the return of the MSCI ACWI Index.
2 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of October 31, 2022 based on the return of the S&P 500 Pure Growth and Pure Value Indexes.
3 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of October 31, 2022 based on the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index.
4 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of October 31, 2022 based on the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index.
5 FactSet as of October 31, 2022 based on the S&P 500 Index.
6 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of October 31, 2022 based on Fed Funds futures pricing.
S&P 500® Index
A market-capitalization-weighted stock market index that measures the stock performance of the 500 largest publicly traded companies in the United States.
S&P 500® Pure Value Index
A style-concentrated index designed to track the performance of stocks that exhibit the strongest value characteristics by using a style-attractiveness-weighting scheme.
S&P 500® Pure Growth Index
A style-concentrated index designed to track the performance of stocks that exhibit the strongest growth characteristics by using a style-attractiveness-weighting scheme.
Bloomberg US Corporate High Yied Index
Tracks the performance of US dollar denominated below investment grade corporate debt publicly issued in the US domestic market.
A term for rules-based investment strategies that don’t use conventional market-cap weightings.
The views expressed in this material are the views of the SPDR Research and Strategy team and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell any security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy of such information, nor liability for decisions based on such information. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Unless otherwise noted, all data and statistical information were obtained from Bloomberg LP and SSGA as of October 31, 2022. Data in tables have been rounded to whole numbers, except for percentages, which have been rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
The research and analysis included in this document have been produced by SSGA for its own investment management activities and are made available here incidentally. Information obtained from external sources is believed to be reliable and is as of the date of publication but is subject to change. This information must not be used in any jurisdiction where prohibited by law and must not be used in a way that would be contrary to local law or legislation. No investment advice, tax advice, or legal advice is provided herein.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
Bonds generally present less short-term risk and volatility than stocks, but contain interest rate risk (as interest rates raise, bond prices usually fall); issuer default risk; issuer credit risk; liquidity risk; and inflation risk. These effects are usually pronounced for longer-term securities. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to a substantial gain or loss.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
Concentrated investments in a particular sector or industry tend to be more volatile than the overall market and increases risk that events negatively affecting such sectors or industries could reduce returns, potentially causing the value of the Fund’s shares to decrease.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.