Are you sure you want to change languages?
The page you are visiting uses a different locale than your saved profile. Do you want to change your locale?
Sentiment around global earnings was already negative and is likely to be exacerbated by coronavirus fears
With broad based growth scarce, investors may continue targeting high growth market segments
The price for growth is poised to continue increasing, which may lead to a more volatile return path and idiosyncratic drawdowns
After the S&P 500® Index posted its fastest correction in history, many investors are wondering about the ramifications for the global economy and its growth potential in 2020. In a key development, the Federal Reserve (Fed) executed an emergency rate cut of 50 basis points on March 3rd to ease the possible economic disruptions caused by the spread of the new coronavirus, yet the market’s reaction was mixed.1
On one hand, a rate cut will likely lower the cost of capital and free up more money to potentially offset the business impact from a shift in consumer behavior. On the other hand, it won’t limit the spread of the virus nor remedy manufacturing losses throughout the supply chain. A rate cut isn’t a cure for the virus; even with monetary policy actions, the outlook for growth is cloudy.
Here, we examine the latest trends in economic and fundamental growth prospects for 2020 and their portfolio implications.
Sentiment and manufacturing measures take a leg down
As shown below, economic sentiment recently turned positive after weathering several challenges in 2019, including trade wars and Brexit delays. With the spread of the new coronavirus, however, sentiment is likely headed back to an underwhelming state.
Source: Bloomberg Finance, L.P., as of February 28, 2020. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
In fact, we have already seen manufacturing figures from all corners of the world disappoint in early March. Output contracted in 15 of 31 economies,2 including China, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, Taiwan, South Korea and Australia. The US and UK saw output growth, albeit below estimates. The coronavirus impact was evident in China’s February data, as shown below.
As a result, we have seen a coordinated response from monetary policymakers and G7 nations. On the fiscal side, though, no specific plans have been offered yet—just forward guidance. China and Malaysia have enacted some relief, but it is localized to each nation.3
Source: Bloomberg Finance, L.P., as of February 28, 2020. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Key takeaway: Don’t expect economic growth to act as a tailwind or a volatility backstop in 2020. Do expect more downside revisions to figures worldwide, with some nations (i.e., China) likely falling well below their trend rate.
2020 earnings growth estimates fall to zero
As the new coronavirus continues to spread, analysts at both JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs have indicated that 2020 earnings growth could be zero for S&P 500 firms.4 They aren’t alone in downgrading estimates, as shown below, nor are the downgrades confined to the US. Over the last year, there have been more downgrades than upgrades for every major region, with the ratio falling in February—right as coronavirus news broke worldwide.
Source: FactSet, as of February 28, 2020. Characteristics are as of the date indicated, are subject to change, and should not be relied upon as current thereafter. EPS growth estimates are based on Consensus Analyst Estimates compiled by FactSet.
Growth revisions were already skewed to the downside, as illustrated by the three-month changes to 2020 EPS estimates shown below. Only Emerging Markets managed to post positive changes in recent months, though that has since changed.
Source: FactSet, as of February 28, 2020. Characteristics are as of the date indicated, are subject to change, and should not be relied upon as current thereafter. EPS growth estimates are based on Consensus Analyst Estimates compiled by FactSet.
Key takeaway: Sentiment around global earnings was already negative and is likely to be exacerbated by fears stemming from the coronavirus’s impact on supply chains and consumer behavior. Don’t expect fundamental growth to act as a tailwind or volatility backstop—remember, we had three Fed rate cuts in 2019 and growth was already subdued.
Q1 2020 earnings to be an important gauge
Offering the first results since the coronavirus outbreak, the Q1 2020 earnings season will be an important fundamental event to gauge sentiment. Negativity around earnings is reaching across sectors in the US. Cyclical sectors potentially impacted by a reduction in global demand, such as Energy, Industrials, Materials, and Consumer Discretionary, have seen the most negative earnings growth changes—not only for Q1 but also for the entire year.
Source: FactSet, as of February 28, 2020. Characteristics are as of the date indicated, are subject to change, and should not be relied upon as current thereafter. This information should not be considered a recommendation to invest in a particular sector. It is not known whether the sectors shown will be profitable in the future
Only the Tech sector has seen meaningfully positive changes to its 2020 earnings estimates, despite having sizeable revenue exposure to China and other overseas nations.5 The positive changes stem from an improved outlook for expanding technologies, such as cloud computing and other software services. A strong Q4 2019 earnings season is also helping, given that Tech had:6
Currently, six sectors are projected to have positive earnings growth in Q1.8 With the severity of the coronavirus impact still very much unknown—especially at the tail end of the month when these revisions were being made—we can expect growth across the sectors to be taken down a notch, led by cyclicals. As such, the number of sectors posting negative earnings growth may increase. Given that Microsoft and Apple have already forewarned issues,9 expect figures for the tech sector to also decline but remain in positive territory.
Key takeaway: Don’t expect strong earnings growth to drive markets. The Fed rate cut may offset some weakness, but revision trends were negative in 2019 despite three rate cuts, as noted above. For 2020, a continually lower bar means firms will need to significantly jump over it in order to attraction positive attention. Stocks that disappoint could be uniquely punished.
Growth stocks may become even more attractive
A low-and-slow growth environment hasn’t been a major problem for stocks. Earnings growth in 2019 for S&P 500 firms is estimated to be 0.6%, after all firms finish reporting.10 Three of the four quarters in 2019 had negative earnings growth, yet the S&P 500 returned more than 30% for the year. Trends in global earnings and equity performance were similar even though the IMF downgraded global growth to 3.1%, the lowest rate since 2009.
All this low growth has led investors to pay up for growth stocks. Growth stocks have outperformed the broader market and value exposures by 10% and 20%, respectively, since 2018.11 With rates going lower, higher-growth stocks become even more attractive as:
Valuations, a shown below, haven’t stopped investors from gravitating towards growth stocks and the premium on growth stocks is likely to increase. Current valuations for growth using a combined metric score plot in the top 97th percentile over the past 15 years. If this was extended back to the dot-com bubble, valuations would still be in the highest 90th percentile.
Source: Bloomberg Finance, L.P., as of February 28, 2020. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Key takeaway: Growth will likely continue to outpace value. The price for growth will also continue to increase, which may lead to a more volatile return path with idiosyncratic drawdowns, something we saw glimmers of late in 2019.12
If you feel heat around the corner
Markets are currently characterized by microbursts of idiosyncratic volatility and questions around growth stability—but valuations are elevated for the highest-growth firms. This was the environment before the coronavirus, too.
When some investors feel heat around the corner, they leave. With monetary policy acting as a potential support system, however, the ideal strategy may seek to mitigate market downside but participate in upside moves by targeting firms with quality growth characteristics trading a reasonable prices, such as the SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactorsSM ETF (QUS).
Continue following SPDR® Blog to keep up with my Charting the Market series and other market insights. You can also download our full monthly Chart Pack.
1The S&P 500 Index initially rose, before falling with only two sectors positing positive returns on 03/3/2020
2“Global manufacturing contracted in February by the most since 2009”, Bloomberg 03/02/2020
3“China Vows More Fiscal Support as Virus Roils a Slowing Economy”, Bloomberg 2/16/2020; “Malaysia Announces Stimulus Package to Blunt Coronavirus Hit”, Bloomberg 2/27/2020
4“JPMorgan Joins Goldman in Cutting Profit Estimates for S&P 500”, Bloomberg 2/27/2020
5The technology sector generates 56% of its revenue from overseas per FactSet 02/29/2020
6FactSet 02/29/2020
7FactSet 02/29/2020
8FactSet 02/29/2020. Communication Services, Energy, Information Technology, Utilities, Health Care, and Real Estate
9"Microsoft and other tech firms sound alarm over coronavirus impact", Axios 02/27/2020
10FactSet 02/29/2020
11Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of 03/02/2020 based on cumulative returns for the S&P 500 Growth, S&P 500 Value, and S&P 500 Index
12Growth fell by 4% relative to value in early September as a result of a reversal in sentiment. Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of 02/28/2020
S&P 500 Index
The S&P 500, or the Standard & Poor's 500, is an index based on the market capitalizations of 500 large companies having common stock listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ. The S&P 500 index components and their weightings are determined by S&P Dow Jones Indices.
The views expressed in this material are the views of SPDR Americas Research Team and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information.
All the index performance results referred to are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only. It should not be assumed that they represent the performance of any particular investment.
Passively managed funds hold a range of securities that, in the aggregate, approximates the full Index in terms of key risk factors and other characteristics. Passively managed funds invest by sampling the index, holding a range of securities that, in the aggregate, approximates the full Index in terms of key risk factors and other characteristics. This may cause the fund to experience tracking errors relative to performance of the index.
Actively managed funds do not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index. The strategy is actively managed and may underperform its benchmarks. An investment in the strategy is not appropriate for all investors and is not intended to be a complete investment program. Investing in the strategy involves risks, including the risk that investors may receive little or no return on the investment or that investors may lose part or even all of the investment.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
Volatility management techniques may result in periods of loss and underperformance may limit the Fund's ability to participate in rising markets and may increase transaction costs.
A momentum style of investing emphasizes securities that have had higher recent price performance compared to other securities, which is subject to the risk that these securities may be more volatile and can turn quickly and cause significant variation from other types of investments.
Investments in small-sized companies may involve greater risks than in those of larger, better known companies.
Companies with large market capitalizations go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. Larger companies tend to be less volatile than companies with smaller market capitalizations. In exchange for this potentially lower risk, the value of the security may not rise as much as companies with smaller market capitalizations.
Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole. They can remain undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
Because of their narrow focus, sector funds tend to be more volatile.