An important evolution within factors has been the rise of multi-factor strategies. As characteristics differ across factors, strategies that are called “multi-factor” may provide different outcomes to investors, and play different roles in portfolios. Small construction differences can make big impacts, even if the names seem similar.
In the first part of my Q&A blog series with Mark Carver, Global Head of Factor Index Products at MSCI, we explored how MSCI constructs their multi-factor indices. In this blog, we discuss Mark’s perspective on the role of factor strategies in portfolios and trends in factor investing.
Matthew: We often hear factor strategies referred to as a blend between active and passive. Can they be a direct replacement for one or the other? Or does it depend on the type of factor strategy?
Mark: It really depends on the investor—I like to use the expression that “where you sit depends on where you stand.” What this means is that for those investors who think any portfolio that weights stocks differently from their market cap is a bet against the market we often see the factor index allocation come from the “active” portfolio. On the other hand, if the investor believes factors are systematic and transparent investments, something like a beta, we observe the funding for the factor allocation coming from the so called passive or index-based portfolio. Both approaches are perfectly reasonable—as the choice is largely based on the way you define and view a factor itself.
Matthew: When taking a multi-factor approach to investing, is there a benefit to having, say, three factors in a single package, or should an investor just buy the factors individually?
Mark: There is a trade-off between costs and control to some extent. Trading costs are a real consideration, since buying the factors individually would involve three trades instead of one if investors execute through a product like the ETFs, (i.e. establishing the position in the strategy that packages factors together) when rebalancing back to the assigned weights of the factor mix. Assuming the same weight to the factors the performance wouldn’t differ materially, assuming the rebalancing is done at the same time as the combined package, but you cannot ignore the trading cost component of this. However, some investors may want to change the weights or set guardrails on the weights to the individual factors which might mean a preference for implementing with the individual factors.
Matthew: We’re frequently asked about factor timing. What’s your viewpoint?
Mark: Timing factors is extremely difficult. When making decisions on timing, you want as many options in play (i.e. market breadth) as possible to reduce the probability that you get it wrong. With factors, you’re talking about timing only the core six factors—value, quality, momentum, volatility, size, and yield, which is quite limited and makes timing very challenging.
There are some factor timing mechanisms designed based on one or multiple signals, such as macroenvironment, valuations, etc. Sometimes different signals may have contradictory conclusions. Given all the challenges, some argue that it’s better to be diversified among factors than trying to get the timing right.
Interestingly enough, being diversified with set rules in effect provides a naive timing impact. When factor performance shifts, a multi-factor approach which sets rebalancing rules in advance will reduce factor exposures with possibly expensive valuations and buy the ones with potentially more attractive valuations as on a relative basis it has not performed as well as the other factors in the mix.
Matthew: What are the trends or concerns in factor investing that everyone should be aware of?
Mark: The biggest trend is the move toward multi-factor. For a long time, investors were using factors as tools to fill gaps in portfolios, so they were very single factor oriented. For example, an investor would add a value factor strategy to a portfolio lacking value exposure. Today, people are using factors more as core exposures, so it serves as the foundation of a portfolio. This naturally leads to a conversation around multi-factors, which may offer diversification benefits.
We’ve also seen greater demand for transparency. We get a lot of questions about index construction and whether the index will perform true to its design. This level of scrutiny is far more intense than it was just two years ago, likely because the number of factor products has grown and they now represent a bigger part of the portfolio. To provide this we’ve spent a lot of time walking clients through index performance as well as the relative drivers based on the methodology or rules that establish the construction of the factor portfolio.
Matthew: Mark, thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. It’s great to get insight and perspective from one of the pioneers in factor investing.
This material is for your private information. The views expressed are the views of Matt Bartolini and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. The opinions expressed may differ from those with different investment philosophies. The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon.
This material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment or tax advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information.
Because of their narrow focus, sector investing tends to be more volatile than investments that diversify across many sectors and companies.
While diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss, investors in Smart Beta may diversify across a mix of factors to address cyclical changes in factor performance. However, factors may have high or increasing correlation to each other.
ETFs trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk, fluctuate in market value and may trade at prices above or below the ETFs net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns.
Standard & Poor's®, S&P® and SPDR® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC (S&P); Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (Dow Jones); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI) and sublicensed for certain purposes by State Street Corporation. State Street Corporation's financial products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates and third party licensors and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability in relation thereto, including for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index.
Distributor: State Street Global Advisors Funds Distributors, LLC, member FINRA , SIPC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of State Street Corporation. References to State Street may include State Street Corporation and its affiliates. Certain State Street affiliates provide services and receive fees from the SPDR ETFs. ALPS Distributors, Inc., member FINRA, is the distributor for DIA, MDY and SPY, all unit investment trusts. ALPS Portfolio Solutions Distributor, Inc., member FINRA, is the distributor for Select Sector SPDRs. ALPS Distributors, Inc. and ALPS Portfolio Solutions Distributor, Inc. are not affiliated with State Street Global Advisors Funds Distributors, LLC.
THIS SITE IS INTENDED FOR U.S. INVESTORS ONLY.
No Offer/Local Restrictions
Nothing contained in or on the Site should be construed as a solicitation of an offer to buy or offer, or recommendation, to acquire or dispose of any security, commodity, investment or to engage in any other transaction. SSGA Intermediary Business offers a number of products and services designed specifically for various categories of investors. Not all products will be available to all investors. The information provided on the Site is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation.
All persons and entities accessing the Site do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations. The Site is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where the publication or availability of the Site is prohibited, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise. Persons under these restrictions must not access the Site.
Information for Non-U.S. Investors:
The products and services described on this web site are intended to be made available only to persons in the United States, and the information on this web site is only for such persons. Nothing on this web site shall be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security to any person in any jurisdiction where such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction.
Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. To obtain a prospectus or summary prospectus which contains this and other information, call 1-866-787-2257, download a prospectus or summary prospectus now, or talk to your financial advisor. Read it carefully before investing.
Not FDIC Insured * No Bank Guarantee * May Lose Value