The COVID-19 pandemic has created a new trend line for our society. From changes to our daily routines, to how we pay for things, to how we consume media and stay connected, our lives have been disrupted. Some of these trends were already in place before the pandemic, but now, these changes are likely to be amplified as we transition to a more digitally connected (yet physically separate) world.
A tectonic shift of this magnitude may create tangible opportunities, and investors are likely to seek out specific exposure tools to capture one or all of these next-generation (NextGen) trends. As a result, thematic ETFs are likely to become more popular than those that adhere to the market-cap-weighted archetype or traditional sector frameworks. And over the last few weeks more have been filed, with some launched. But thematic ETFs and their portfolio construction, can vary significantly.
Due diligence is key as these ETF offerings are spread over such an extensive range. The first step in due diligence is to understand what strategies are in scope, and that requires classification. Creating a classification scheme, however, is the windmill that ETF nerds, like me, constantly tilt at. And thematic ETF classification is the mother of all windmills and a true (don) quixotic journey.
Classifying thematic ETFs
Systematic classification is always the goal. In a blog post, I discussed how we created a systematic classification for smart beta strategies. I took the same approach with thematic ETFs, and it almost broke me. I first tried to use Bloomberg’s characteristic data, which is notoriously robust, but failed: it was impossible to systematically classify exposures based on market available data (i.e., market cap, sector, and industry information) AND underlying portfolio traits (i.e., weighting scheme, holdings, etc.). Corner solutions emerged quickly. Funds that should be included were not, and others snuck in – like a traditional technology sector ETF. Every time I tinkered with the code, another problem sprung up. It was whack-a-mole coding.
After hours of trying to engineer a process, I abandoned it in favor of a more qualitative approach that required dissecting all 2,000-plus funds listed in the US. But some quantitative analysis was required, so I culled the list by removing any funds that were easy to exclude (i.e., traditional sector ETFs, as well as broad market cap beta equity, fixed income, and commodity exposures).
To identify the funds, I leveraged applicable portions of New Economies framework developed by our partner S&P Kensho and grouped them into 12 thematic categories based on their fund objective:
The result was the identification of 137 funds, comprising $36 billion of assets focused on these particular NextGen trends. As shown below, most of the assets are in funds classified as Broad Innovation and Clean Energy. Clean Energy gets a boost from some legacy ESG ETF positions. However, since the pandemic, there has been noticeable interest over the last few months in Cloud Computing and Future Communications – outside of just broad innovation.
NextGen trends performance potential
While the flows are concentrated in certain areas, the performance trends are actually quite dispersed among the categories. In 2020, the average return for thematic NextGen ETFs was 6%, besting the S&P 500® Index by 9%. However, the dispersion across the space was 71%! The best performance for any of the thematic ETFs identified was an eye-popping 48%, yet the worst return was -23%. The fund with the best return in 2020 resided in Cloud Computing, while the worst return was found in Democratized Banking. However, some funds in Cloud Computing produced negative returns year-to-date in 2020, while certain strategies in Democratized Banking have registered positive returns. This discrepancy is an indication of how theme selection and a fund’s portfolio construction process are crucial.
While the performance range is wide-spread, the number of funds in each bucket outperforming the broader market has been high. So far, in 2020, 64% of all NextGen trend funds beat the S&P 500 with 82% outperforming over the last three months. The categories that had the highest hit rate year-to-date, and over the past three months (i.e., a period covering when the world changed) are Broad Innovation, Future Security, and Cloud Computing, as shown in the chart below.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of 06/19/2020. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Calculations by SPDR Americas Research. You cannot directly invest in an index.
But performance comes at a cost. The average fee for these NextGen trends funds is 57 basis points – 20% higher than the average fee charged on all ETFs. Performance also comes with higher volatility, as every category has a higher average standard deviation of returns than the S&P 500 over the last 12 months. These ETFs also have a high level of concentration, as the median number of holdings is 52. The median market cap weight within each fund is $34 billion – a full 90% below the S&P 500 and an indication of a noticeable size bias in these portfolios. Lastly, from a valuation perspective, these exposures are more skewed towards growth than value, given a higher median price-to-book and price-to-earnings for the portfolios compared to the S&P 500.
Understanding the potential and choosing the right tool
The pandemic has led to an inflection point that may present NextGen opportunities that are not currently well represented in traditional market exposures. But choosing single stocks for exposure to this new wave of innovation comes with significant risk: not all “innovative” firms innovate successfully. A diversified investment approach that is non-market cap weighted, like a thematic ETF, is optimal when targeting thematic NextGen trends.
There is, of course, a risk, of getting the theme right, but using the wrong implementation tool. To get both right requires an understanding of:
All facets are important in seeking to position portfolios for a post-COVID-19 world with NextGen trend ETFs. Not to mention, what actually classifies as a NextGen trend ETF!
Continue following our research for more insights on thematic ETFs, our classification system, and due diligence processes.
S&P 500 Index
The S&P 500, or the Standard & Poor's 500, is an index based on the market capitalizations of 500 large companies having common stock listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ. The S&P 500 index components and their weightings are determined by S&P Dow Jones Indices.
The views expressed in this material are the views of Matthew Bartolini through the period ended June 19th, 2020 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without State Street Global Advisors’ express written consent.
The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.