The stock market has been on a fervent rally since March, rallying by over 65% as of December 2. 1 However, because not all stocks have participated equally, the rally has been described as having “bad breadth.”
However, November’s strong market gain of 18 percentage points has changed the market’s breadth – from bad to good. This performance was supported by two headwinds being removed at the same time: US election uncertainty was resolved, and promising vaccine trials that firmed up the timeline for the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine acted as the “mint or stick of gum” that the market needed.
In this charting the market, I will showcase how pervasive the change in the market’s breadth has been.
One measure to gauge whether all boats are rising with the tide is to calculate the percentage of firms trading above a technical level, such as a stock’s 200-day moving average. If the S&P 500 Index is notching all-time highs, but only slightly more than half the stocks are trading above their own recent averages, the broad market gains are being powered by only a handful of stocks. This trend occurred in the spring and summer months.
However, as shown below, that summer/spring trend flipped with the November rally. Now, more than 450 stocks in the S&P 500, or 90%, are trading above their respective 200-day moving averages. The closing of the gap between the two-time series plotted below illustrates how more firms are participating in the latest rally.
Another typical measure of breadth is to compare the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index with the heritage market-cap-weighted version. This follows the premise that if the rally is broad based, then an exposure in which all stocks are weighted equally should be outperforming a more top-heavy gauge (i.e., smaller big stocks are rallying at the same pace as the biggest big stocks).
Up until November, the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 had a significant lead on the equal-weighted measure, outperforming it by 8.3%.2 In fact, while the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 was positive on the year, the equal-weighted version was down -5.33%.3 Further to this dichotomy of returns between weighting schemes of the same stocks, while the cap-weighted S&P 500 had registered 15 new all-time highs since the market’s bottom this year, the equal-weighted version failed to eclipse the level it last saw back on February 12. That was until November 9, as shown below.
On its way to new all-time highs, the equal-weighted version outperformed the cap-weighted version by 3% in November – a figure that ranks in the historical 97th percentile.
And while November gets all the credit for closing the gap between the returns for the equal-weighted and market-cap-weighted S&P 500, like DK Metcalf running down Budda Baker,4 burgeoning trends were evident in September and October – yet to a lesser degree. The September and October excess return figures were in the 83rd and 94th percentile, at 1.2% and 2.0%, respectively. However, when added together, the rolling three-month outperformance of equal weight to market-cap weight was also in the 97th percentile, as shown below – again indicating broader participation in the recent market rally.
The same level of breadth improvement was also evident from a sector perspective, as nine out of the 11 equal-weighted GICS sectors outperformed their market-cap-weighted counterpart in November — with Real Estate, Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary, Energy, and Technology having 7.5%, 7.1%, 6.4%, 6.2%, and 4.1% performance bumps, respectively, leading the way.5
S&P 500 Equal Weight Index vs. S&P 500 Index
|November Excess Return||3.3%|
|Rolling Three Month||6.7%|
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of November 30, 2020. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Percentile rank from 1988
Of course, a skeptic might say that this improved breadth is confined to only the largest stocks — yet that would be wrong. The improved breadth, as measured by equal-weighted outperforming market-cap-weighted versions, extends to both mid- and-small-cap stocks – forcefully reinforcing that it was more than just a handful of stocks charging ahead following the positive developments in November. As shown below, both the November and rolling three-month return metrics for mid- and-small-cap stocks were above the 90th percentile. Not to mention, we saw the same spike in firms trading above their own respective technical 50- and 200-day moving averages that large caps had – with close to 90% of mid- and-small-caps firms now trading above those levels, as opposed to approximately fewer than half of each at the start of November. Better breadth is being felt throughout the cap spectrum.
|S&P 400 Equal Weight Index vs. S&P 400 Index||
S&P 600 Equal Weight Index vs. S&P 600 Index
|November Excess Return||2.3%||2.9%|
|S&P 400 Firms||S&P 600 Firms|
|% Above 50-day moving average (current)||88%||89%|
|% Above 50-day moving average (start of month)||41%||37%|
|% Above 200-day moving average (current)||89%||87%|
|% Above 200-day moving average (start of month)||56%||51%|
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of November 30, 2020. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Percentile rank from 1994
Looking ahead, there are four reasons why this ongoing better breadth rally may be sustainable and may put the past periods of mega-caps or bust behind us:
The future, however, remains cloudy, as COVID-19 case rates continue to increase. And just as we have experienced a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, we will also likely see a once-in-a-lifetime recovery, featuring an evolution of social behaviors that is difficult to model with any certainty. But for now, the greater breadth of the latest market rally is constructive for sentiment and creating more confidence that this rally may hold. With these dynamics, specific positioning for the cyclical (banks, value, and small-cap) and secular (broad innovation, clean energy, and intelligent infrastructure) changes ahead may be optimal.
1As of December 2, 2020 per Bloomberg Finance L.P. based on the S&P 500 Index
2 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of December 2, 2020
3 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of December 2, 2020
4 "NFL players, fans take to Twitter to react to DK Metcalf's insane chase down tackle on Budda Baker", CBS Sports October 26, 2020
5 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of December 2, 2020
6 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of December 2, 2020 based on ICI Money Market Fund Asset reporting
7 Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of December 2, 2020 based on the AAII US Investor Sentiment Bullish Readings
8 "Covid-19: Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine judged safe for use in UK from next week", BBC News December 2, 2020
9 “FDA 'working day and night' on COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization, commissioner tells ABC News”, ABC News December 2, 2020
10 “Biden formally introduces economic team, including Yellen for treasury secretary”, NBC News December 1, 2020.
The views expressed in this material are the views of SPDR Americas Research Team and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information.
All the index performance results referred to are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only. It should not be assumed that they represent the performance of any particular investment.
Passively managed funds hold a range of securities that, in the aggregate, approximates the full Index in terms of key risk factors and other characteristics. Passively managed funds invest by sampling the index, holding a range of securities that, in the aggregate, approximates the full Index in terms of key risk factors and other characteristics. This may cause the fund to experience tracking errors relative to performance of the index.
Actively managed funds do not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index. The strategy is actively managed and may underperform its benchmarks. An investment in the strategy is not appropriate for all investors and is not intended to be a complete investment program. Investing in the strategy involves risks, including the risk that investors may receive little or no return on the investment or that investors may lose part or even all of the investment.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
Volatility management techniques may result in periods of loss and underperformance may limit the Fund's ability to participate in rising markets and may increase transaction costs.
A momentum style of investing emphasizes securities that have had higher recent price performance compared to other securities, which is subject to the risk that these securities may be more volatile and can turn quickly and cause significant variation from other types of investments.
Investments in small-sized companies may involve greater risks than in those of larger, better known companies.
Companies with large market capitalizations go in and out of favor based on market and economic conditions. Larger companies tend to be less volatile than companies with smaller market capitalizations. In exchange for this potentially lower risk, the value of the security may not rise as much as companies with smaller market capitalizations.
Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole. They can remain undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
Because of their narrow focus, sector funds tend to be more volatile.