As investors seek active decision making combined with the efficiency, liquidity, and transparency of ETFs, actively managed ETFs are fast becoming core portfolio tools globally. Explore what’s driving this shift—and the implications for portfolio construction and implementation decisions.
Actively managed ETFs, or active ETFs—were once a small sub-set of the global ETF universe. But now, as investor needs broaden and the role of the ETF wrapper expands, active ETFs are attracting growing attention and inflows.
An active ETF combines two distinct components:
This distinction matters. The ETF wrapper governs implementation mechanics, transparency, and operational efficiency. The investment process governs outcomes.
As institutional governance standards evolve—with increased scrutiny on liquidity, transparency, cost control, and implementation precision—the wrapper itself has become strategically relevant.
The overall ETF ecosystem is experiencing sustained net inflows across markets, but active ETFs have been a notable driver for growth: despite representing only 10% of global ETF assets, active ETFs captured approximately 27% of global industry flows in 2025.1 Global ETFs overall attracted US$2 trillion in net inflows in 2025, a new record for annual ETF demand,2 and the industry has now seen nearly seven years (79 consecutive months) of positive net inflows.3
While passive index trackers continue to account for the majority of ETF assets, actively managed strategies are emerging as one of the fastest‑growing segments of the market:
This momentum is increasingly visible beyond the US as investors globally seek the flexibility of active management combined with the efficiency of the ETF structure.
While the US has led ETF adoption historically, other regions are now demonstrating meaningful momentum:
In short, ETF adoption is spreading beyond traditional core markets, and active strategies are part of that movement.
Active ETFs have grown in tandem with the broader ETF industry and are expanding beyond the US, notably in Europe and APAC. Over the past five years, active ETF assets in the US have grown at a 47% CAGR, while ex‑US assets have expanded at a strong 34% CAGR as adoption accelerates across regions.10 This growth demonstrates the increasingly global reach of actively managed ETFs (Figure 2).
Actively managed ETFs are no longer primarily a US phenomenon—they are increasingly part of product lineups in Europe, APAC, and other markets. Key themes in global adoption of active ETFs include:
Beyond headline asset growth, regional differences are also evident in how investors are using active ETFs across asset classes:
The rise of active ETFs is largely driven by three interrelated forces:
Even as passive investing has grown, many investors still see the value in the role that active management can play in portfolios—particularly in markets where inefficiencies or rapid change can create opportunities for skilled managers.
Fund surveys suggest a high level of investor interest in increasing active ETF exposures in the near future, with many allocators planning to expand use of active strategies.20
This desire is not limited to one region—global institutions, consultants, and advisors are thinking pragmatically about what the ETF wrapper enables.
2 The ETF wrapper brings operational benefits
Active ETFs combine two attributes:
In many cases, that combination supports implementation goals such as:
This structural appeal is especially compelling for investors who want active insight with enhanced operational flexibility.
3 Portfolio construction is shifting from “benchmark vs. alpha” to “outcome vs. risk”
The binary framing of passive versus active has given way to a more nuanced question: what role does a strategy play to achieve portfolio objectives?
Investors are increasingly using active ETFs to:
To realize these goals, a wider array of actively managed ETF strategies are increasingly available globally—from traditional equity and bond products to more targeted approaches like sector ETFs or income-oriented exposures. Institutional and retail markets alike are seeing active ETF innovation.
4 Fixed income complexity and the case for active management
The case for active ETFs is particularly visible in fixed income. Bond markets are fragmented, issuer dispersion is wide, and liquidity varies significantly across instruments and market regimes. These factors make security selection, portfolio construction, and trading judgement critical to outcomes.
Investor behavior reflects this reality. Global active fixed income ETFs have grown nearly to US$560 billion in assets, marking a 46% CAGR over the past three years.21 In 2025, active strategies attracted 35% of all fixed income ETF flows, despite accounting for only 19% of assets,22 highlighting strong investor demand for active judgement in credit selection, duration management, and liquidity management.
Performance outcomes further reinforce the case for active management in core bond allocations. In 2025, 57% of active core fixed income managers outperformed their benchmarks. By contrast, in the equity market’s core category—large blend strategies—only 28% of active managers outperformed.23
This gap highlights a key distinction between asset classes. While equity markets tend to be more efficient and centralized, fixed income markets offer greater scope for skilled managers to add value through security selection, curve positioning, and risk management.
For institutions, this reflects a structural need. Active fixed income ETFs can provide a scalable way to access alpha potential at the core of portfolios, combining manager discretion with the transparency, liquidity, and implementation efficiency of the ETF wrapper.
For global investors, the rise of active ETFs changes the shape of implementation rather than the fundamentals of investment philosophy.
Institutions globally are operating in an environment with some combination of higher macro volatility, regime uncertainty, and/or tighter governance oversight. The ability to adjust exposures efficiently—intra-period, during transitions, or alongside liability-aware adjustments—has become more valuable.
The ETF format provides intraday tradability and exchange access, potentially simplifying operational workflows compared with some traditional pooled vehicles. For institutions managing multi-manager structures or cross-asset overlays, this can be a meaningful consideration.
Active management within the ETF delivery format creates practical implications: