March’s banking turmoil forged a mixed picture in the market. Even though the market ended the month on an upswing, all is not rosy for the economy, and uncertainty continues to persist.
March’s banking turmoil underscored the point that uncertainty is likely to persist for the foreseeable future. Amid the uncertainty in markets, the Active Quantitative Equity (AQE) team relies on bottom-up diversified stock selection in conjunction with close observation of top-down macroeconomic exposures. This combination of complementary analytical angles enables the team to identify the best quality companies in which to invest.
Any event that threatens the US or global financial system is typically a significant occurrence. In early March, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank, two American mid-sized banks, collapsed, marking the biggest failure of a US bank since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). Shortly after, Credit Suisse, which was already teetering, was bought out by Swiss bank UBS in a move intended to shore up the global banking system and to prevent the former financial institution from collapsing. Concerns about a potential domino effect in banking systems failing continued to persist. Interestingly, during March, the only negatively-impacted segments of the market were financials. Every other sector carried on. In fact, most of the equity markets seemed to celebrate the potential change of the interest rate trajectory and the equity market was up overall. Even though the market was up, we do not think this is necessarily a sign that everything is rosy for the economy.
The sell-off in the first couple of weeks of March reached its worst point when fears of a wider financial system crisis peaked on March 13. After that, fears abated, and the market experienced a sharp rally, rising almost 6% from the low.
What was interesting about the rebound, is that while the market experienced a reversal, the segments that dragged the market down — banks, financials, insurance, real estate, and energy — also underperformed during the market rebound.
During the market decline, both high growth and defensive groups of companies outperformed. Yet during the rebound, the high growth, more expensive growth segments (e.g. technology, media, and retail) performed more strongly than the market overall, while the cheaper and lower risk segments (e.g. utilities, staples, health care, and telecommunications) underperformed.
Figure 1: March Matrix of Sector Performers
This rebound pattern echoes the strong market conditions we saw in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. During that period (and oversimplifying it), the zero-interest rate environment spurred risk taking and multiple expansion of high growth segments of the equity market. Investors went from fearing the worst economic conditions as a result of the global shutdown, to taking a lot of risk as a result of the accommodative monetary policy.
It makes sense that if investors think the failure of SVB and other regional banks could lead to a change in monetary policy and subsequent rate cuts, this would lead to another round of risk taking and multiple expansion.
However, it is also possible that the banking sector turmoil could lead to a weakened economy, which would not be positive for growth stocks, thereby leading to a strong flight to defensive equities as a result.
Currently, across global developed markets, value exposure is found most significantly in telecommunications, traditional autos, banks and energy sectors. High quality stocks are in health care and technology. Segments with strong sentiment include consumer services, capital goods, and retailing. As is evident, these characteristics lead to different preferences.
When we blend them together, our highest picks right now are in financials and health care, while our least preferred are real estate, utilities, and media.
The uncertainty around these macroeconomic outcomes is a theme that is likely to endure for the foreseeable future. For this reason, bottom-up diversified stock selection is essential, and needs to be complemented with careful monitoring of top-down macroeconomic exposures, and a blend of characteristics to select the highest quality companies. Value, sentiment, and quality all work together to maximize the chances of success in multiple future economic scenarios.
For use in EMEA: The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This communication is directed at professional clients (this includes eligible counterparties as defined by the appropriate EU regulator) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons, and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
Important Risk Information
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
The views expressed are the views of Active Quantitative Equity through April 12, 2023, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions.
Quantitative investing assumes that future performance of a security relative to other securities may be predicted based on historical economic and financial factors, however, any errors in a model used might not be detected until the fund has sustained a loss or reduced performance related to such errors.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value and can decline significantly in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
© 2023 State Street Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.
Exp. Date: 04/30/2024