Companies are continuing to respond to our call and adding women to the highest positions of their organizations.
With our Fearless Girl campaign playing no small part, today there is global focus on the value of diversity in the boardrooms.
Independent oversight of the board and its key committees
Board effectiveness, skills and experience
Board refreshment and succession-planning processes
Number of Engagements
Did you know that since the launch of the Fearless Girl campaign …
In the US, 62% or 612 / 983
Russell 3000 companies we identified as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
In the UK, 83% or 15 / 18
FTSE 350 companies we identified as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
In Canada, 45% or 39 / 87
TSX companies we identified as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
In Europe, 71% or 10 / 14
STOXX 600 ex-UK companies we identified as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
In Japan, 46% or 140 / 302
TOPIX 500 companies we identified as not having as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
In Australia, 69% or 44 / 64
companies we identified in the ASX 300 as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
In Hong Kong, 17% or 2 / 12
companies we identified in the Hang Seng as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
In Singapore, 0% or 0 / 6
companies we identified in the Straits Times as not having a woman on their board added a female director.
On the eve of International Women’s Day 2017, State Street Global Advisors placed a statue of a Fearless Girl in the heart of New York’s Financial District, to raise awareness about the importance of gender diversity in corporate leadership and to call attention to our minimum expectation for companies to have at least one woman on their boards.
Today, there is a global focus on the value of diversity in the boardroom; this is a far cry from where we started out just over three years ago and this change has had a direct impact on the tone of our engagements. When we engage with companies that lack gender diversity, the conversation is no longer about ‘why’ we are engaging on this issue. Instead, the focus is on ‘why not’ enhance their board by embracing the value of diversity.
Fearless Girl Impact — Worldwide Numbers
Fearless Girl's Fourth Anniversary
On March 8, 2021, in celebration of International Women’s Day and Fearless Girl’s fourth anniversary, we launched an exciting activation at the statue in front of the New York Stock Exchange. The installation reflected a broken glass ceiling, representing the many glass ceilings that women have shattered, especially in the last year, both in and out of the boardroom. Because when one glass ceiling shatters, it shatters for us all.
Regional Focus: Our Engagement and Voting Action in 2020
United States (Russell 3000) The campaign’s momentum continued in the US in 2020, building on its positive impact from the previous years. Since the launch of our campaign, 612 of the Russell 3000 companies initially identified have added at least one female director to their boards. As of Q4 2020, 6% of Russell 3000 companies had all male boards, down from 24% at the start of our campaign.1 We view these as proof points of gender diversity’s status of a mainstream boardroom issue and the ongoing impact of our campaign.
Canada (TSX) In 2018, the first year of our Fearless Girl campaign in Canada, 37% of companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) lacked gender diversity on their board.2 We identified 73 companies in our investable universe without a female on their boards. Among these companies, 45% have added a female board member.
Europe and the Middle East
UK (FTSE 350) In the UK, we continued to monitor the few remaining companies in the FTSE 350 that were lacking in board gender diversity. Of the 18 companies identified, 83% (15 companies) have added a female director to the board since Fearless Girl’s original placement.
Europe (STOXX 600 ex-UK) In 2018, we also expanded the Fearless Girl campaign to the STOXX 600 ex-UK. During the year, 10 companies added a woman to their boards.
Japan (TOPIX 500) In 2018, we expanded our campaign to Japan, where 56% of TOPIX 500 (281 out of 500) listed companies had all-male boards as of December 2017.3 Since then, despite the low levels of gender diversity, we saw significant progress in companies’ willingness to appoint women to their boards.
We informed these companies of our expectations with regard to diversity. Consequently, 46%4 or 140 of those companies have added a female director to their boards since the expansion of our campaign into Japan.5
During our engagements, many companies explained that they could not identify qualified, internal female candidates to appoint in the next three-to-five years. However, as part of our engagement we helped companies to establish a pathway to improve gender diversity levels within their organizations as this market was starting from a much lower base in terms of establishing a pipeline to improve gender diversity. This pathway included establishing goals, improving hiring practices, and enhancing disclosure related to each company’s position on gender diversity.
In 2020, we voted against directors at 106 companies of Japanese companies that were unresponsive to our engagement efforts.
Australia (ASX 300) Australian companies have continued to respond well to our call to action, with the percentage of companies within the ASX 300 without a female director decreasing from 17% to 6% over a four-year period.6
Hong Kong (Hang Seng) In early 2020, when we introduced our gender diversity policy in Hong Kong, 22% of companies (11 issuers) within the Hang Seng index lacked a female director. In the course of 2020, 2 companies added a woman to their board.
Singapore (Straits Times) We started to apply our gender diversity policy to the companies within Singapore’s Straits Times index in 2020, when 23% of the companies (six issuers) did not have a woman on their board. By the end of 2020, none of 6 companies responded to our call. We will continue holding these companies accountable.
1 2016 figures: Board profiling universe includes 2,743 companies listed on the Russell 3000. Source: ISS Analytics as of November 2016. Q4 2020 figures: https://www.equilar.com/reports/78-q4-2020-equilar-gender-diversity-index.html 2 Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Analytics as of December 2017 3 Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Analytics as of December 2017 4 302 TOPIX 500 listed companies have been identified through the campaign through December 2020 5 Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Analytics as of February 2021 and State Street Global Advisors Database 6 ISS Analytics as of March 2020 and State Street Global Advisors Database
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA's express written consent.
This document may contain certain statements deemed to be forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and that actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward looking statements.
This information is for informational purposes only, not to be construed as investment advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment manager or to invest in a fund. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s), are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients. There are no guarantees regarding the achievement of investment objectives, target returns, portfolio construction, allocations or measurements such as alpha, tracking error, stock weightings and other information ratios. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors. SSGA does not provide tax or legal advice. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Investing entails risks and there can be no assurance that SSGA will achieve profits or avoid incurring losses.
Performance quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so you may have a gain or loss when shares are sold. Current performance may be higher or lower than that quoted.
Images of NYSE Group, Inc. are used with permission of NYSE Group, Inc. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies sponsor, approve of or endorse the contents of this program. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies recommend or make any representation as to possible benefits from any securities or investments.