When entering the site and if cookies are prevented from being saved, a message must be displayed
in a popup message box informing the user that their local browser settings are preventing
cookies from being saved and that cookies are required for the site to work. Exact text
to be provided for UAT. On OK click of the message, the user should be redirected to
the global landing page (currently ssga.com).
It’s late 2017. For most of the year, financial markets have been very strong. There are some signs that the bull market is nearing its end — including ongoing uncertainty around the fate of the president’s tax cut legislation — but even still, few investors actually pull back as the year draws to a close.
What kept investors from pulling back a few months earlier? Certainly, optimism was a big factor. But as important as any market dynamic was another reason: a tendency on the part of investors to interpret new evidence as confirmation of existing beliefs or theories.
Sure enough, in February 2018 markets plummeted. The reasons weren't terribly surprising: inflation fears in the wake of a better-than-expected jobs report, political uncertainty around government spending. And in the days following, things bounced back. But the spike in volatility was frightening: At one point, the Dow industrials fell more than 1,500 points in one day — the biggest single-day drop in market history.1
Behavioral scientists call it “confirmation bias,” and it’s a topic that Dan Farley, the head of State Street Global Advisors’ Investment Solutions Group, thinks about a lot. It’s not surprising. In a world where political decisions and the media are increasingly driven by social media and the “fake news” phenomenon, even the simplest decisions can be fraught with peril. Complicated financial decisions like where and when to invest are even more difficult.
Dan’s team has a big job. They’re entrusted with managing US$307 billion in client assets, with investors looking for a range of services — from a top-down perspective on their investment portfolios, to portfolio construction at the widest lens, to narrower mandates to boost returns on one slice of their overall portfolio.
What is one of the biases his team runs into most? “The need to keep hiring additional active managers,” Dan says. While active management is a critical aspect of reaching return objectives, he says, many institutions believe that the more managers they hire, the more diversified their portfolio will be. But according to Dan, the evidence suggests otherwise. “Obviously, diversification is really important to reducing risk. And it is not that active management doesn’t play an important role in meeting objectives. But at a certain point, simply putting more of your money into competing active equity management philosophies doesn’t increase returns. They begin to offset each other. The result is that it just becomes brown soup — an expensive brown soup.”
Here, Mehvish Ayub, a London-based senior investment manager, steps in. “Tactical asset allocation is a way of solving this bias toward adding more security selection managers.” By focusing on asset allocation, she says, the team can exploit some of the macro inefficiencies in the market. This allows them to offer clients a tool that not only generates alpha, but also alpha that is distinct (or, in investing parlance, “uncorrelated”) from stock picking and other traditional types of active management.
Building the Perfect Beast: Portfolio X
But what’s the process for getting there? Each month, the team refines what it calls “Portfolio X.” Far from the images of superheroes its name conjures, Portfolio X is the Investment Solutions Group’s master portfolio. Mehvish puts it another way: The portfolio represents the team’s “best ideas and point of view.”
Every step of the team’s monthly alpha process has a quantitative and fundamental component — a way of working through biases of their own. The meticulous process begins by assessing the market environment, combining a proprietary quantitative-based market regime indicator with a qualitative assessment of the political environment provided by the team’s Politics and Policy group. “The view on Chinese steel tariffs is going to look very different in Sydney than here in London,” says Mehvish. “This gives us a sense of the risk-seeking appetite investors have.”.
Next, the model looks at market return drivers and produces expected returns for every asset class in 140 markets. Each return is checked and rechecked by asset class teams comprised of portfolio managers located around the globe. “Good ideas travel,” Mehvish says. “By recognising that early in the process, we try to identify what the model might be missing.”
The model proposes a series of optimised trades that can be used in a portfolio, then the group breaks into seven independent teams that make trade recommendations. The structure of multiple voting teams with a firewall between each of them is designed to avoid herd mentality and groupthink. “Instead of listening to the loudest person in the room,” she says, “we’re relying on the wisdom of crowds.”
Enter the Devil’s Advocate
But there is one more step to take. It’s something called the Devil’s Advocate — and according to Mehvish, it is a unique aspect of the process.
“The Devil’s Advocate was actually one of the things I found attractive about this job when I interviewed,” the London School of Economics graduate says. It’s not hard to understand why: At a point in the process when most shops would be taking the product to market, State Street Global Advisors challenges members of its team to make the best possible arguments against the consensus trades the team has voted to make.
Mehvish, who has served as a Devil’s Advocate a number of times during her nearly four years with the firm, describes the rapid-fire process. Kicking the tires on some of the team’s biggest assumptions, she says the Devil’s Advocate goes back to the beginning of the alpha process. “We’ll analyse the quant side — build arguments on why we shouldn’t have trusted the decision on that model. We’ll pressure-test the qualitative decisions the teams have made. Or maybe it’s a macro factor — views for or against the dollar.”
The role is challenging. “By design, you aren’t told the exact topic until the day before,” she says. “You really need to think on your feet and ask, ‘What could substantiate this argument?’ ‘What thematics does the base portfolio represent?’ ‘What could be challenged?’ You have to review the work of the asset class teams and third-party research to ensure the rigor of the arguments.”
Mehvish notes that, “Often we do our own evaluation of quant models based on the idea that maybe the team is missing something.” Are there ever any hard feelings? “No comment,” she says with a smile, though she quickly adds that the position of Devil’s Advocate constantly rotates. “At some point, we all will have been in this position, which I think helps build trust in the process.”
How successful is the Devil’s Advocate? Mehvish estimates that these arguments and insights are incorporated into the final product about 20 to 25 percent of the time. If that seems low, it’s a testament to the quality of the process it is challenging. “The entire alpha process is structured in a considered way,” she says. “If the process works and the trades are sound to begin with, then they should stand up, whatever arguments are brought against them.”
Driving Results for Clients
After all of that work, there’s scarcely a dollar of the US$100 billion the tactical asset allocation team manages that isn’t influenced in some way by Portfolio X.
Dan describes a foundation that recently turned to State Street Global Advisors for some help. “They were looking for total returns of 7.5 percent. But even a reasonably prudent strategic asset allocation will only get you into the high fives based on our long-term expected returns. By the time we were asked to help, they were already spending 4.5 percent of their endowment each year, which needs to grow by 2 percent to combat inflation. They spent another 1 percent on fees — and already had a broad lineup of active managers.”
Can adding an additional active manager help make up the difference? “To an extent,” Dan says. “But most institutional investors can only dedicate so much of their portfolio to active equities or a single investment manager. This is where tactical asset allocation can give them another option.”
It’s been an effective tool for investors, according to Dan. “The baseline for our model portfolio is 80 bps of return above benchmark,” he says. “We’ve done a pretty good job delivering that on an annualised basis over the last decade.” Looking back, Dan and Mehvish agree that the whole process is ultimately about playing Devil’s Advocate and challenging biases. “It forces us to pause and think about different counterpoints and weigh them,” Mehvish says.
At the same time, Dan adds, it’s a good reminder that there are limits to how much objectivity managers can add to the investment process. “You can’t eliminate bias any more than you can eliminate risk,” he says. But, he quickly notes, “one of the things we’ve learned is that by really understanding those biases and how they impact the decisions people make, you can turn them into an opportunity.”
Products referenced in this piece are not available in all regions. These references are provided for illustrative purposes only. The content of this web page should not be considered a recommendation to invest in a particular sector or to buy or sell any security mentioned.
The above-referenced SPDR S&P 500 (SPY), fund has not been registered for sale in or listed on any market outside of the United States, nor has any regulatory authority outside of the United States approved the sale or distribution of the funds. Persons wishing to invest in the SPDR S&P 500 (SPY), fund should satisfy themselves as to full observance of the laws of the relevant territory in which they are resident in connection with any such investment.
For use in Australia. Issued by State Street Global Advisors, Australia, Limited (AFSL Number 238276, ABN 42 003 914 225) (“SSGA Australia”). Registered office: Level 17, 420 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia T: +612 9240 7600 Web: ssga.com. This communication is directed at institutional and wholesale clients only. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) are not entitled to rely on this communication.
For use in EMEA. The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the European Communities (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulations 2007. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The information provided does not constitute investment advice as such term is defined under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2004/39/EC) and it should not be relied on as such. This communication is directed at professional clients (this includes eligible counterparties) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
For use in Switzerland. The information provided does not constitute investment advice as such term is defined under applicable Swiss regulation and it should not be relied on as such. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information. This communication is directed at qualified investors (as defined by FINMA) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information.
The views expressed in this material are the views of State Street Global Advisors through the period 5/15/18 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA's express written consent.
This information is for informational purposes only, not to be construed as investment advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment manager or to invest in a fund. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s), are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients. There are no guarantees regarding the achievement of investment objectives, target returns, portfolio construction, allocations or measurements such as alpha, tracking error, stock weightings and other information ratios. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors. SSGA does not provide tax or legal advice. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Investing entails risks and there can be no assurance that SSGA will achieve profits or avoid incurring losses.
Performance quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so you may have a gain or loss when shares are sold. Current performance may be higher or lower than that quoted.
Images of NYSE Group, Inc. are used with permission of NYSE Group, Inc. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies sponsor, approve of or endorse the contents of this program. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies recommend or make any representation as to possible benefits from any securities or investments.