In the three-legged relay of European elections (in Germany, France and then Italy), the German election was supposed to be the one with the least market impact. German politics are characterized by constancy, consistency and consensus as personified by the outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel. Her departure is one reason why this year’s election is much more uncertain than any previous ones. Since the German government is central to Europe’s medium-term policy mix, a wider set of assets than usual is vulnerable to the election outcome with uncertainty possibly persisting beyond the election day.
In this context, we will explore the election dynamic more deeply, including possible outcomes and potential market implications. For investors, the critical point is that, in this unusually uncertain election, very small shifts in voting behavior could fundamentally change the election outcome. This not only prevents election outcomes from being properly priced in at this stage but also creates considerable potential for a market surprise on election night.
Why So Much Uncertainty?
Investors hate uncertainty and frankly, they have rarely had to worry about German politics. When political shifts occur in Germany, they are usually well telegraphed and then national elections confirm the prevailing trend. This year is no different, but the specific arithmetic of polling distribution means there is a very small margin of error for any scenario to materialize. In other words, very small shifts in voting behavior (as little as 2%-3%) could fundamentally alter the outcome of the election, even if voters are just switching parties within a political camp.
Figure 1 shows the polling tracker since the 2017 federal election in Germany, which contains multiple insights. First, most of the major polling volatility in 2021 has been limited to the ‘Bourgeois Bloc’ of conservative, social democrat and green parties (the center-right Free Democrats do not count as they have also positioned themselves as a protest party despite espousing largely mainstream policy positions). Together, these parties have polled around two-thirds of the vote fairly consistently over the past four years. However, due to the arithmetic of coalition building, the relative strengths of each of these three parties yields different potential government coalitions.
Figure 1: Polling Tracker for Germany Since 2017
Although Germany’s electoral system requires parties to garner a minimum of 5% of the popular vote in order to be represented in parliament, the collection of votes for ‘other’ small parties is important because of their impact on the coalition arithmetic. Due to the 5% electoral threshold, those votes are essentially wasted, and the share of votes of the remaining parties is enlarged. In practice, an average of 5%-6% of votes go to smaller parties and consequently, any winning coalition only needs to garner 47%-48% of the popular vote.1 This was the case in 2002, when Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and the Greens governed with 47.1%, and in 2009, when Ms. Merkel and the Free Democrats formed a government based on 48.4% of the votes.
Why Does This Election Trivia Matter?
The simple point is that the margin of error is very small and no election outcome can be properly priced in at this stage. Moreover, there is considerable scope for a market surprise on election night. The immediate market reaction will be determined by three main factors: the speed of government formation, the stability of any prospective government coalition and the expected policy mix on key areas such as fiscal and eurozone policy.
Figure 2 summarizes our views on the key metrics on election night. First, we believe most government formations will be slow and there will be some uncertainty premium. After the inconclusive 2017 elections, the EUR/USD lost about 2% from election day until talks for a ‘Jamaica’ coalition were abandoned and a restart of a grand coalition was announced (the trade-weighted euro also paused its year-long appreciation during this time). Second, the stability of any such government is similarly important as it would narrow or widen any uncertainty premium.
Figure 2: Coalition Options, Odds and Key Characteristics
Failure to build a coalition, thereby requiring a re-run of the election, is a distinct possibility. Germany has never been governed by a three-party coalition, so such a configuration would be somewhat experimental and inherently less stable than the previous two-party arrangements. In this regard, the participation of the Free Democratic Party is slightly more fraught with uncertainty given its policy positions and electoral strategy of capitalizing on disappointment with the other centrist parties.
Ultimately, the policy agenda is what will matter most, and what will impact asset prices across Europe. The exact composition of the final coalitions – that is, the relative electoral percentages of each party in the coalition – is critical, as this will determine the relative political weights in government. In the absence of that information, at this stage, we can only discuss the potential direction of fiscal and eurozone policy at a high level.
The most bullish scenario for investors would be a stable German government with an unprecedented appetite for fiscal expansion and eurozone reform. This would likely either be a Black-Green coalition or the ‘Kenya’ combination with a strengthened Social Democratic Party. Either outcome could see the euro strengthen, equity sentiment rise and peripheral spreads narrow in the days after the election. Conversely, the most bearish outcome would be an inconclusive election with most credible coalitions failing to secure a solid majority either at the ballot box or in coalition talks. At this point, ultimate election outcomes hinge on very small differences in voting behavior. Investors should brace for the possibility of a substantial surprise when votes are tallied.
1.In fact, the threshold could even be slightly lower due to changes in the recent electoral law. This could disproportionately benefit the center-right Christian Democratic Union of Germany/Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CDU/CSU) alliance, adding a few seats to their representation. Germany runs on a dual-election system with votes by district as well as proportional representation on national lists. Many voters of smaller right-wing parties still vote CDU/CSU for district. This phenomenon is less concentrated on the left wing, where the Social Democratic Party, Greens and Left voters split their vote less frequently.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without State Street Global Advisors’ express written consent.
The views expressed in this material are the views of Elliot Hentov through 02 September 2021 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
All information is from State Street Global Advisors unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data.
For EMEA Distribution: The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
SPDR ETF is the exchange traded funds ("ETF") platform of State Street Global Advisors and is comprised of funds that have been authorised by European regulatory authorities as open-ended UCITS investment companies. SPDR ETFs may not be available or suitable for you.
ETFs trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk, fluctuate in market value and may trade at prices above or below the ETFs net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns.
Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of an investment. Further, there is no guarantee an ETF will achieve its investment objective.
SHARES IN THE FUNDS OF THE SPDR® ETF SICAV, SSGA SPDR ETFS EUROPE I AND SSGA SPDR ETFS EUROPE II PLC MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR OR SUITABLE FOR YOU. THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS SITE DO NOT CONSTITUTE INVESTMENT ADVICE. INDEPENDENT ADVICE SHOULD BE SOUGHT IN CASES OF DOUBT. NEITHER THE INFORMATION NOR ANY OPINION CONTAINED ON THIS SITE CONSTITUTES A SOLICITATION OR OFFER TO BUY OR SELL SHARES OF THE FUNDS OR ANY OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT.
Standard & Poor's®, S&P® and SPDR® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC (S&P); Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (Dow Jones); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI) and sublicensed for certain purposes by State Street Corporation. State Street Corporation's financial products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates and third party licensors and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability in relation thereto, including for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index.
SPDR ETFs may be offered and sold only in those jurisdictions where authorised, in compliance with applicable regulations.
Information related to Mexico
This information does not constitute and is not intended to constitute marketing or an offer of securities and accordingly should not be construed as such. The Funds referenced herein have not been, and will not be, registered under the Mexican Securities Market Law (Ley del Mercado de Valores) and may not be publicly offered or sold in the United Mexican States. Disclosure documentation related to any of the aforementioned Funds may not be distributed publicly in Mexico and shares of the Funds may not be traded in Mexico.
You should obtain and read a prospectus and KIID relating to the SPDR ETFs prior to investing. Further information and the prospectus/KIID describing the characteristics, costs and risks of SPDR ETFs are available for residents of countries where SPDR ETFs are authorised for sale on the SPDRs website and from your local SSGA office.