The best explanation for which equity sectors outperformed in September can be found in a multi-dimensional view of each stock, including its valuation, quality, and sentiment indicators.
The Active Quantitative Equity (AQE) team has been closely examining the September equity drawdown to better understand what was “conventional” versus “unconventional” about it and how these findings inform the AQE team’s process. September’s decline of more than 9% was the eighth worst monthly return for the MSCI World Index in 30 years.
Historically, investors concerned about a market drawdown have looked to lower-risk, defensive segments like Real Estate, Utilities, Telecoms, Consumer Staples, and Health Care. And investors concerned about a market drawdown have also typically avoided higher-risk segments like Financials, Materials, Industrials, and Technology.
Over the last 30 years, when equity markets have experienced monthly declines of more than 5%, defensive segments have generally outperformed the broad market index. However, September was a decidedly different outcome. Health Care and Consumer Staples were great cushions for the overall market drawdown, but Utilities, Real Estate, and Telecoms all markedly underperformed. On the other hand, Materials and Financials – higher-risk segments that would typically underperform in a market drawdown – outperformed the market in September. See Figures 1 and 2
Figure 1: Excess Returns of Defensive Segments During Monthly MSCI World Index Drawdowns of More Than 5%
December 1991 to Present
Figure 2: Excess Returns of Higher-Risk Segments During Monthly MSCI World Index Drawdowns of More Than 5%
December 1991 to Present
Also, if we look at risk attributes like volatility and beta (instead of segment), history would tell us that a monthly market return of -9% would on average be coupled with a spread return for lower-risk versus higher-risk quintiles of stocks of approximately +8.5% (using simple regression analysis). However, during September, the spread return for lower-risk versus higher-risk quintiles of stocks was only +3.5%.
Why didn’t lower-risk stocks provide the expected payoff relative to higher-risk stocks in September? Interest rate sensitivity may be part of the answer. Financials should achieve better earnings when interest rates rise, and long-duration, debt-heavy industries like Utilities and Real Estate are negatively exposed to rising rates.
That said, we believe that a better explanation for which segments outperformed in September can be found in a multi-dimensional view of each stock, including its valuation, quality, and sentiment indicators. This means that, while AQE’s overall preferences coming into September were generally aligned with lower-risk attributes, these additional considerations supported our continued favoring of Health Care and Consumer Staples, as well as our continued avoidance of Real Estate. Among higher-risk sectors, they also led us to favor Financials and avoid Technology.
In the June commentary, we remarked that AQE’s preferred stocks across the developed equity market were “…in total, quite a bit less risky than the average stock.” We also clarified that it didn’t mean AQE only liked low-risk segments, or that all low-risk segments were attractive. And we used Energy (high risk but attractive) and Real Estate (low risk and unattractive) stocks to highlight this nuance. September market action supported the thinking in that discussion.
In sum, a difficult September has at least reminded us of the importance of assessing stocks on multiple dimensions, systematically, to help weather storms such as those created by unexpected market drawdowns and other volatile events.
Figure 3: Sector Preferences of AQE Stock Selection Model
State Street Global Advisors Worldwide Entities
For use in EMEA: The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This communication is directed at professional clients (this includes eligible counterparties as defined by the appropriate EU regulator) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons, and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
Important Risk Information
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
The views expressed are the views of Active Quantitative Equity through October 13, 2022, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions.
Quantitative investing assumes that future performance of a security relative to other securities may be predicted based on historical economic and financial factors, however, any errors in a model used might not be detected until the fund has sustained a loss or reduced performance related to such errors.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value and can decline significantly in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
© 2022 State Street Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.
Tracking Code: -5016878.1.1.GBL.RTL
Exp. Date: 10/31/2023