Are you sure you want to change languages?
The page you are visiting uses a different locale than your saved profile. Do you want to change your locale?
Global equities experienced a significant drawdown in early 2020 as the onset of COVID-19 and the associated economic shutdown sent markets tumbling. However, at the end of August 2020, global equities (MSCI World Index) had returned to their pre-crisis all-time highs and were up 5.34% year to date.1
At that time (25 August 2020), we posed the question in our Strategy Espresso Have we come too far, too fast? with the recovery, suggesting that investors seeking to remain long at those valuations could “consider a Global Low Volatility allocation to position against the negative effects of lingering uncertainty.“ This turned out to be a timely note as market benchmarks for US equities (S&P® 500 Index -3.84%) and eurozone equities (EURO STOXX® Index -1.81%) sold off in September. The Low Volatility ETFs in these associated market benchmarks outperformed by 2.05% (SPDR® S&P® 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and 1.71% (SPDR® EURO STOXX® Low Volatility UCITS ETF).2
However, many investors may have missed this opportunity, since low volatility strategies failed during the COVID-19 sell-off in Q1 to deliver their historically observed drawdown protection. This can largely be attributed to idiosyncratic characteristics of the pandemic’s impact on equity markets. A careful examination of the historical returns of a Low Volatility approach, in both US and eurozone equities, explains that the March 2020 performance was an outlier and more recent performance (September 2020) is more in line with the historical trend.
Figures 1 and 2 show the relationship of relative (excess) returns of a Low Volatility approach versus the market cap benchmark (“market return”) for both US (Figure 1) and eurozone (Figure 2) equities on a monthly basis since the inception of the respective Low Volatility indices. In both instances, there is a strong negative correlation between the excess returns of a Low Volatility strategy and the market return. This would suggest that when the market was down, Low Volatility historically delivered outperformance (and vice versa). Looking at the correlation coefficients for each suggests a strong relationship (US 0.3452, eurozone 0.3487).
As we discussed in August, we believe the recovery should encourage equity investors. However, there are still notable events on the horizon as we head into year end (e.g. US election outcomes and ongoing COVID-19 impact), which may continue to worry investors about equity price sensitivity at the current levels. Cautious investors may begin to favour a Low Volatility approach, especially as strategies such as US and eurozone Low Volatility have returned to their historical trend, in terms of relative performance. Investors seeking a diversified approach to remaining long at these valuations can consider a Low Volatility allocation to position against the negative impacts of lingering uncertainty.
SPDR offers a suite of Low Volatility strategies that follow a simple and yet effective methodology. In one simple trade, investors can introduce a defensive posture to their global equity allocations using the SPDR® S&P® 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF or SPDR® EURO STOXX® Low Volatility UCITS ETF . To learn more about these ETFs, and to view full performance history, please click on either fund name to be taken to its fund page.
Our newly launched SPDR Smart Beta Compass combines analysis of equity factor performance, Smart Beta ETF flows and institutional investor positioning to provide a market review and outlook for factor-conscious investors.
Click here to read the SPDR Smart Beta Compass.
Figure 1: Monthly US Low Volatility Active Return vs. Market Return (Since May 2011)