Let’s start with the basics. Exchange traded notes (ETNs) are unsecured debt instruments that seek to track a reference asset (e.g., a niche market sector, the return of the S&P 500® Index, or the movements of the CBOE VIX Index). Typically issued by banks, ETNs trade on an exchange like stocks.
An exchange traded fund (ETF) is a pooled investment that either seeks to track an index or is actively managed. ETFs can be purchased or sold on an exchange just like a regular stock.
There are three key differences between ETNs and ETFs:
ETNs are unsecured debt instruments, or “notes,” issued by a bank. As a result, they carry the counterparty risk of the issuer.
An ETF, however, is a fund backed by underlying holdings – typically stocks or bonds. The counterparty risk, from the investor’s perspective, is negated. This is because the ETF’s holdings are fully backed by underlying investments and are not reliant on a counterparty’s ability to repay an investment.
For example, if there were an ETN on high-tech stocks (e.g., FANG stocks), and those stocks rallied by 1,000%, that would be great, right? Well, with ETNs, it’s complicated. If the issuing bank does not have the capacity to pay the investor when they want to redeem, the investor doesn’t get their money back.
Consider this. If the bank that issued the note were to go bankrupt (e.g., Lehman Brothers and the three notes they issued), the investor would risk a total default on the note. To get any money back, they would have to get in line with all of the bank’s other creditors in the bankruptcy process.
A return on an ETN is a function not just of the underlying reference asset’s return, but also the issuing entity’s capacity to pay.
For an ETF, the investor’s shares are fully backed by the securities the fund holds. Using the same example as above, the fund would sell the underlying securities to meet the redemption. As a result of the ETF’s in-kind creation-redemption process, the underlying securities would be distributed out of the fund to a market maker or Authorized Participant in return for the ETF shares that the end investor sold.
As a result, an ETF’s return is based on the return of the underlying assets2 – not on the ETF sponsor’s (e.g., an asset management firm) ability to repay an investor for their shares.
To obtain the underlying reference asset exposure and payoff profile, ETNs will explicitly use derivatives like futures or swaps and will not hold physical securities, such as bonds, stocks, or commodities.
Given the use of derivatives that are typically price-return securities — meaning they do not usually produce an income stream — most ETNs do not pay any dividends. This is a bit antithetical to the notion of ETNs being a debt security, as debt instruments usually produce income.
While there are some levered and inverse ETFs that use derivatives to obtain exposure, the majority of ETFs do not. In fact, only 1.3% of all US-listed ETF AUM is in funds that use only derivatives for implementation.3
The average fee for an ETN is 75 basis points (bps), while the average fee for an ETF is 55 bps.4 And there are some ETFs that have fees as low as 3 bps, while the lowest-fee ETN is around 45 bps.5
There are also higher costs in terms of trading, as some ETNs trade less than 100 shares a day and have wide bid-ask spreads, as well as more volatile premiums/discounts — the latter evidenced by the recent events on that one note.6 In fact, the median daily volume over the last three months for ETNs is just $217,000 a day as compared to $1.1 billion for ETFs.7
While their names sound similar, their differences are stark. An ETN is an unsecured debt instrument that uses derivatives to obtain exposure while charging high fees. And ETN investors could lose their entire investment based solely on the creditworthiness of the issuer.
Alternatively, ETFs are fully backed pooled investments with fees as low as three bps. And an investor’s return depends on how the stocks or bonds in the fund perform, not if the company behind the fund has a credit event.
Investors will want to do their due diligence not just when selecting specific funds, but also when evaluating investment vehicles, to ensure they understand the potential benefits as well as the risks. Review fund documents for full details, and be sure to speak with a local sales team member who can help answer any questions you may have.
1 Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of March 28, 2022. Premium is the current stock price versus net asset value.
2 An ETF’s return could also be minimally impacted by the premium/discount of the fund if purchased on the secondary market.
3 Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of March 28, 2022. Based on calculations from SPDR Americas Research.
4 Morningstar, as of March 28, 2022.
5 Morningstar, as of March 28, 2022.
6 Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of March 28, 2022. Based on calculations from SPDR Americas Research.
7 Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of March 28, 2022. Based on calculations from SPDR Americas Research.
CBOE VIX Index
A measure of implied market volatility on the S&P 500.
An acronym for the technology stocks Facebook, Apple, Netflix and Google.
S&P 500® Index
A market-capitalization-weighted stock market index that measures the stock performance of the 500 largest publicly traded companies in the United States.
The views expressed in this material are the views of the SPDR Research and Strategy team through the period ended March 28, 2022 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Unless otherwise noted, all data and statistical information were obtained from Bloomberg LP and SSGA as of March 28, 2022. Data in tables have been rounded to whole numbers, except for percentages, which have been rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
Passively managed funds invest by sampling the index, holding a range of securities that, in the aggregate, approximates the full Index in terms of key risk factors and other characteristics. This may cause the fund to experience tracking errors relative to performance of the index.
While the shares of ETFs are tradable on secondary markets, they may not readily trade in all market conditions and may trade at significant discounts in periods of market stress.
There can be no assurance that a liquid market will be maintained for ETF shares.
Any fund may use over-the-counter swaps, derivatives or a synthetic instrument (collectively "Derivatives") to increase or decrease exposure in a particular market, asset class or sector to effectuate the fund's strategy. Derivatives agreements are privately negotiated agreements between the fund and the counterparty, rather than an exchange, and therefore Derivatives carry risks related to counterparty creditworthiness, settlement default and market conditions. Derivatives agreements can require that the fund post collateral to the counterparty consistent with the mark-to-market price of the Derivative. SSGA makes no representations or assurances that the Derivative will perform as intended.
The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data.