When entering the site and if cookies are prevented from being saved, a message must be displayed
in a popup message box informing the user that their local browser settings are preventing
cookies from being saved and that cookies are required for the site to work. Exact text
to be provided for UAT. On OK click of the message, the user should be redirected to
the global landing page (currently ssga.com).
Seven Questions for Jenn Bender, Rohit Nagori and Mitesh Tank
River Wu, a portfolio specialist for our equity indexing strategies, recently sat down with our research team to discuss their paper which explores new dimensions of a longtime value-creation opportunity.
River: Could we start by defining what the “index effect” is?
Jenn: The term “index effect” refers to the excess returns (positive or negative) that stocks being added to, or deleted from, an index experience between the announcement date of a change in index composition and the actual index change date. There has been extensive research measuring the value-add opportunity represented by the index effect over the last 30 years, as well as anecdotal evidence which suggests that arbitrageurs and active managers have sought to capitalize on this effect since it was originally noted. Much of the original research on this topic was tied to the S&P 500.
River: What caused you to revisit, and expand on that research?
Mitesh: With the remarkable growth in indexed assets in the last few decades, investors are increasingly interested in the index effect, both as a way to add value in a world where alpha has become harder to generate, and for what it says about the impact of indexing on overall market efficiency. Being able to add incremental returns in indexed mandates is not new, but the relevance of this approach has grown as traditional stock-picking methods have been challenged in the face of faster and broader information access for all market participants. Meanwhile, regulators concerned about the ramifications of indexing on market efficiency are also focused on the index effect as a way to gauge the overall impact that indexing has on security returns. The market microstructure continues to evolve, and we wanted to get a grasp on the direction and amount of change in the “index effect.”
River: Updating prior research, what did you find?
Rohit: We found that the potential value-add opportunity1 of the index effect no longer exists for the S&P 500 and, more generally, is marginal for the most popular US Large Cap stock indices. However, in certain pockets outside of US Large Caps, such as Emerging Markets and Developed Market Small Caps, the potential value-add opportunity of the index effect was still sizeable.
River: Do you have thoughts about why the index effect differs among similar indices?
Rohit: One possible explanation for the disparity could be a correlation between value-add opportunity and turnover2. The average turnover for the S&P 500 between 2010 and 2018 was 45 basis points (0.45%), compared to 177 basis points (1.77%) for the Russell 1000 and 152 basis points (1.52%) for MSCI USA. Turnover is one of the key dimensions upon which the index effect depends. But we needed to continue our research around other possible drivers.
River: What dimensions of the index effect did you explore, and what did you discover?
Mitesh: It was clear from our early observations that we needed to study the index effect across a wide variety of dimensions. Our latest research highlights the differences in index-related value-add opportunity for index additions compared with index deletions. We also explored, at a security level, how liquidity (or illiquidity) impacts the index effect value-add opportunity.
River: Given that the index effect is changing (and even disappearing in certain instances), how did you expand the research to uncover new opportunities?
Mitesh: For several indices we modelled the index effect that would result if trading on expected index changes was possible closer to the cut-off period prior to the rebalance announcement. This shift substantially boosts the value-add opportunity, and the strategy turns out to be not as large a risk as it might otherwise appear; this is because reasonably effective prediction models can be built. Any increase in value-add opportunity might warrant consideration of this tactic by those seeking to capitalize on the index effect.
River: As a wrap-up, what would you say are the key takeaways we should remember from your research?
Jenn: First and foremost, index effect value-add opportunities continue to exist in specific indices across specific dimensions, but they do vary in magnitude and risk. Second, predicting index changes ahead of the rebalancing announcement date can potentially produce the greatest value-add. Our research reinforces the fact that, as the indexing space continues to change and expand, the nature of the index effect will continue to evolve. Last but not least, because every penny matters in today’s return-starved environment, we firmly believe that long-term institutional investors could benefit from index effect-related value-add opportunities (within conservative risk budgets) if implemented through a systematic approach based on rigorous and nuanced research.
Jennifer Bender is a senior managing director in global equity beta solutions at State Street Global Advisors; Rohit Nagori is a quantitative research analyst in global equity beta solutions at State Street Global Advisors; Mitesh Tank is a vice president in global equity beta solutions at State Street Global Advisors. River Wu is an equity portfolio specialist at State Street Global Advisors.
The views expressed in this material are the views of the Global Equity Beta Solutions Team through the period ended January 31, 2020 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA's express written consent.
1The total return of buying additions at market close on the analysis date compared with the market close of the index rebalance date minus the total return of selling deletions at market close on the analysis date compared to the market close of the index rebalance date. 2The sum of absolute weight changes considered for analysis.
This information is for informational purposes only, not to be construed as investment advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment manager or to invest in a fund. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s), are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients. There are no guarantees regarding the achievement of investment objectives, target returns, portfolio construction, allocations or measurements such as alpha, tracking error, stock weightings and other information ratios. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors. SSGA does not provide tax or legal advice. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Investing entails risks and there can be no assurance that SSGA will achieve profits or avoid incurring losses.
Performance quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so you may have a gain or loss when shares are sold. Current performance may be higher or lower than that quoted.
Images of NYSE Group, Inc. are used with permission of NYSE Group, Inc. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies sponsor, approve of or endorse the contents of this program. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies recommend or make any representation as to possible benefits from any securities or investments.