When entering the site and if cookies are prevented from being saved, a message must be displayed
in a popup message box informing the user that their local browser settings are preventing
cookies from being saved and that cookies are required for the site to work. Exact text
to be provided for UAT. On OK click of the message, the user should be redirected to
the global landing page (currently ssga.com).
Demand, data and diversification are the three elements required for ESG investing to flourish within DC plans. For sponsors, monitoring these dimensions will offer insight in to the rates of institutional and individual change.
While environmental, social and governmental (ESG) investing acceptance and application in the United States has trailed global trends, there are signs suggesting a scaling shift. Here we focus on three trends that sponsors should watch as early indicators that an ESG era is dawning.
Why Little Progress Has Been Measured So Far
ESG and retirement investing seem likea natural fit, because both disciplines view the world through a particularly long-focus lens. But many sponsors have yet to make the connection. A July 2018 study by New England Pension Consultants (NEPC) found that 88% of U.S. plan sponsors have yet to incorporate ESG into their defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC) plans.1 This figure aligns with Callan’s DC Index™, showing that only 16% of U.S.DC plans offer a dedicated ESG option.2
In the NEPC survey, sponsors report several common concerns
84% say participants have not asked for ESG options.
38% consider only financial factors when evaluating plan investments.
27% need more data about ESG’s impact on performance.3
In addition, sponsors also seem to be waiting for clearer public policy guidance. In April 2019, an Executive Order (EO) directed the Department of Labor (DOL) to examine data filed by retirement plans under ERISA for any discernible trends in investing or proxy voting in the energy sector. The DOL was also ordered to revise or issue guidance in order to “promote energy infrastructure and economic growth.” The evident purpose of the EO is to apply extra scrutiny to any application of ESG principles that might disfavor retirement plan investments in the petroleum sector. It’s possible the EO could slow the adoption of ESG, but some observers view the order as mostly symbolic. Its practical effect may simply be to abate activist investor spending by requiring shareholders to prove the materiality of ESG factors. The administrative debate will probably continue until a compromise emerges. In the meantime, it’s a conversation that merits close monitoring.
3 Trends that Could Signal a Scalable ESG Shift
Three industry indicators could create a more welcoming environment for ESG integration:
1. New populations demanding new solutions. Yesterday’s retirement plans need retooling to meet the unique needs of Millennial and Gen Z workers —including their long-time horizons. At State Street, we already apply unique investment approaches by life stage. For younger participants, for example, our Target Retirement 2060 Fund stacks a high equity allocation on top of a small-and mid-cap tilt and long U.S. bonds to maximize opportunity over the long run. This philosophy could extend to include ESG options for younger savers in order to hedge against downside risks that previous retirees never had to consider —from superstorm damages to the impact of droughts on textile manufacturing to rising global obesity costs.In addition, as younger generations move to center stage in the American economy, their concerns about investing in socially responsible ways are likely to bring ESG considerations further into the mainstream.
2. Better, more consistent ESG data. ESG investors have long struggled to find a consistent approach to defining whether an investment aligns with an ESG philosophy. Now, asset managers are pursuing solutions to help. For example, State Street is working to create a clearer and more consistent foundation for ESG data, combining multiple data sources with active company engagement to deliver standardized, transparent ratings and reporting. This new in-house ESG scoring system, called R-Factor, collects raw company metrics from multiple data providers and scores more than 5,000 companies on a consistent scale of 0 to 100. Its goal is to take the guesswork out of ESG reporting, easing the adoption of ESG strategies.
3. The growing popularity of alternatives. Sponsors’ interest in alternative asset classes is increasing. As we discussed in an earlier issue of The Participant, plan sponsors may consider dipping their toe into ESG using an approach similar to the way they are incorporating real assets and other alternative asset classes. Currently, ESG prevalence in DC plan lineups is on par with emerging market equity, REITs and global fixed income. As demand for alternative asset classes grows, the rising tide of popularity is likely to buoy ESG strategies as well.
ESG: Bridging to the Future
The pace of DC ESG adoption has been gradual, slowed somewhat by muted domestic demand and confusing policy guidance. But today, demand worldwide is growing, the data are improving and the diversification potential of ESG is winning wider recognition. Prudent plan sponsors need to keep a close eye on these three elements in order to monitor market momentum —and avoid being caught by surprise.
For young workers, the world of tomorrow may feel unimaginable, though ESG investing could help prepare participants for the unpredictability by protecting them from new risks and reducing the likelihood that certain perils will ever come to pass. By thoughtfully considering ESG approaches, DC plans could help workers build a more resilient retirement strategy —as well as a more resilient world in which to retire.
The views expressed in this material are the views of SSGA Defined Contribution as at of June 24, 2019, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions.
This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute tax or investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. Investing involves risk, including the risk of loss of principal. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
This information is for informational purposes only, not to be construed as investment advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment manager or to invest in a fund. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s), are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients. There are no guarantees regarding the achievement of investment objectives, target returns, portfolio construction, allocations or measurements such as alpha, tracking error, stock weightings and other information ratios. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors. SSGA does not provide tax or legal advice. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Investing entails risks and there can be no assurance that SSGA will achieve profits or avoid incurring losses.
Performance quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so you may have a gain or loss when shares are sold. Current performance may be higher or lower than that quoted.
Images of NYSE Group, Inc. are used with permission of NYSE Group, Inc. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies sponsor, approve of or endorse the contents of this program. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies recommend or make any representation as to possible benefits from any securities or investments.