A challenging combination of elevated inflation and softening growth demands vigilance from investors. As central banks accelerate monetary policy normalization, recession risks are rising, requiring a more cautious portfolio positioning.
It is no surprise that, given the geopolitical, policy, and market events of the last few months, our market outlook has evolved from the views we expressed in our 2022 Global Market Outlook (published last December). This update summarizes our most recent thinking, including our current macroeconomic and geopolitical outlooks, as well as market outlooks by asset class.
As we look forward over the rest of this year, we’re particularly focused on the risk that the reopening-fueled boom will give way to a bust induced by aggressive tightening. Against this uncertain backdrop, our top-level takeaways for investors include:
The global economic environment has become considerably more precarious following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This powerful stagflationary shock worsens the monetary policy trade-off for nearly every central bank, with the prospect of slower growth colliding with sharply higher inflation. We have trimmed global growth forecasts by a full percentage point to 3.6% and still see risks as skewed to the downside. Meanwhile, upwardly revised inflation forecasts will likely require further boosting.
While the earlier pick-up in inflation was a combination of both supply and demand factors, this latest inflationary impulse is entirely supply-driven. And while central banks are rightly initiating or accelerating rate hikes in a quest to bring monetary policy into better alignment with employment and price indicators, we can’t help but feel some nervousness around what may turn out to be excessively aggressive market pricing for rate hikes. We are concerned about a boom-bust scenario brought about by tightening that could prove to be too much, too late; we would prefer a more cautious path. We believe that demand conditions will soften more visibly in coming months and that the inflation inflection that the Russia-Ukraine War has delayed (but not extinguished) will also become evident before long. This may provide an opportunity for rate path recalibration down the line.
It is also important to remember that, despite attempts at growth deceleration, consumers in many developed markets still sit on substantial excess savings. This is the reason we haven’t slashed our 2022 European growth forecasts too drastically, for example. We believe 2023 could become more problematic in terms of growth as the savings cushion thins, the inventory cycle turns, and the policy tightening bites deeper.
— Simona Mocuta, Chief Economist
The Russia-Ukraine War is the third shock to the global economic order in the past half-decade. Following the Trump trade wars and the COVID-19 pandemic, the war further undermines the existing model of global trade and capital integration. The unfettered drive toward globalization came to a halt after 2008, but the rest of the 2020s will see more dramatic reversals away from a global supply chain optimized for efficiency. Instead, numerous sectors beyond technology (2018 trade wars) and healthcare (2020 pandemic) will now be emphasizing reliability. This could imply higher average production costs, but could also imply a higher share of labor income retained in developed economies. For some export-oriented emerging markets, it could also mean a harder path toward economic convergence, as productivity gains would need to rely more on domestic reform than on foreign capital and know-how.
In addition, there are other region-specific effects worth noting. First, the combined energy/agricultural price shock will lead to worsening external balances for large importing emerging and frontier markets. In some cases, this has the potential to be politically destabilizing — Sri Lanka’s debt default is likely only the first domino to fall. Geopolitically, the Russia-Ukraine War reduces near-term risks of other conflicts, especially in the Taiwan Strait. In Europe, the boost to defense spending will be meaningful, given low levels of public investment by the big laggards of military spending (Germany and Italy), so the end of the peace dividend could actually be slightly growth-enhancing. Finally, the Russia-Ukraine War and severe US-led financial sanctions have raised doubts about the durability of the US dollar-centric monetary order. In our view, these doubts are misplaced as long as large surplus accumulators do not undergo structural reforms that would reduce their surpluses and their concomitant demand for financial assets in the developed world.
— Elliot Hentov, Ph.D, Head of Policy Research
We retain the bias to equities that we outlined in our 2022 base case. Equity risk premia, which rose across all markets at the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine War, remain above long-term average levels. Our view heading into 2022 was positive on equities due to strong fundamentals; now, with the level of earnings upgrades coming through this season — generally in developed markets — we believe an overweight to equities continues to be justified.
That said, we also believe that caution is warranted, and that investors should look for relative value opportunities across the equity landscape. Our prior view had anticipated that the world would be playing catchup to the US as the economic impacts of business re-openings were realized. We also anticipated a lift from fiscal easing in China. But the Russia-Ukraine War has changed the global investing landscape, directly and indirectly. Elevated volatility in equity markets, influenced in particular by rising commodities prices, will likely remain. We continue to see pressure on European equities as the full impact of energy pricing and other inflationary forces flow through to earnings.
It is also likely that, if the war continues for an extended period of time, risk assets will suffer as a consequence. This means that, even though value is clearly emerging in European equities, we must defer judgment until we see an end in sight to the war. We currently prefer US equities, which are less exposed to the war and its effects.
Lastly, because all risk assets are affected to some extent by both the war and by inflationary forces, we retain a bias to quality assets, with the expectation that quality companies will be able to pass on price increases and maintain their margins more effectively than others.
— Gaurav Mallik, Chief Investment Strategist
It seems clear that the US Federal Reserve is intent on squashing inflation, and market participants are ratcheting up rate-hike expectations accordingly. Yes, fundamentals remain strong with healthy earnings and robust balance sheets for corporate and consumer credit, but central banks around the world are set to drain money from the market at a rapid pace — at a time when growth is already slowing. It seems that the only way the Fed can engineer a soft landing at this point is if inflation eases in short order, allowing the Fed to ease off the break. While inflation likely peaked in March of this year, it remains unclear whether it will slow enough to give the Fed the window it needs. The 2 year/10 year curve briefly inverted in April but has since steepened to positive territory, and the 3 month/10 year curve remains very steep. At the same time, geopolitical issues remain front and center and have been adding to negative sentiment. So is this a growth scare or are we looking at a recession in the not-too-distant future? And what does that imply for portfolio positioning?
Our scenario analysis points to an increased probability of the recession scenario, relative to the soft landing scenario, but timing, depth, and duration remain open questions. Value has been building in the term structure of interest rates, but not enough to underwrite the negative momentum and inflationary concerns for the time being. And while credit spreads have widened to reflect some of the issues above, they don’t offer deep value at this point — in a recessionary scenario, they would continue to widen. As such, we remain conservative on both fronts and are focused on timing the turn.
— Matthew Nest, CFA, Head of Active Global Fixed Income
Commodities are experiencing the strongest rally in more than 30 years, with broad-based gains seen across the energy, metals, and agriculture sectors. We anticipate that raw material prices will remain elevated throughout the year, as the structural bull market is supported by limited spare capacity and supply-demand imbalances that are proving difficult to alleviate.
Since the end of 2020, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies (OPEC+) have pushed prices higher by reducing global crude oil inventories by over 700 million barrels, i.e., putting total stocks at their lowest level since 2014. The Russia-Ukraine War has further highlighted Russia’s global energy influence and the reality that their exports of crude oil and natural gas cannot be easily replaced (due to limited spare capacity). Europe receives approximately one-third of its natural gas supplies from Russia, and disruptions to an already tight market have set the stage for prices to continue to rise because alternative energy sources are not readily available.
Industrial metal inventories remain at tight levels, especially copper and aluminum, where balances have been tightening at a pace reflective of robust global demand and Chinese industrial activity (despite recent COVID disruptions). As sanctions against Russia were implemented, global manufacturers have halted engagement with Russia as a trade partner, thus creating a further upside for metals due to supply disruptions. Precious metals have more of a measured outlook, as gold has been supported as an inflation hedge and a safe-haven asset, but higher real yields may provide a headwind.
Surging global commodity demand coming out of the lows of the pandemic — combined with adverse weather-related impacts — have resulted in a significant rise in agricultural prices. Both Russia and Ukraine play a major role in supplying the world with wheat, corn, and barley, along with inputs to fertilizers used by farmers globally. All should see higher prices in the months to come.
At the macro level, the current environment remains favorable for commodities, which have historically performed well during periods of higher inflation. In past inflationary periods, commodities have provided superior protection from rising costs and have offered diversification benefits to traditional stocks and bonds.
With prices across the commodities complex at elevated levels, concerns about a hawkish Fed and about demand destruction are causing investors to wonder if the rally can continue. We acknowledge there may be bumps in the road. Geopolitical risk will contribute to heightened volatility, particularly for those commodities for which Russia and Ukraine have significant global export dependency. However, we expect prices to stay elevated throughout 2022 as the structural bull market within commodities remains intact.
— Michael Narkiewicz, Senior Portfolio Manager, Investment Solutions Group
— Robert Guiliano, Senior Portfolio Manager, Investment Solutions Group
In the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, many of the same challenges to emerging markets (EM) remain. External (global) challenges include tighter liquidity, a narrowing growth differential compared with developed markets (DM), moderating economic growth, and geopolitics. Internal (domestic) challenges include slowing growth, rising inflation, large fiscal deficits, rising debt levels, and this year’s election/political cycle (especially in Latin America). Relatively new challenges include a changed geopolitical landscape (Russia-Ukraine War, China/Taiwan risk, US/China tension), prolonged pandemic-related supply disruptions, China’s “Zero-COVID” policy, and higher commodity prices (especially food and fuel). Add in some uncertainty from China’s regulatory environment and weak property market, and this set of old and new challenges points to continued deterioration in EM growth prospects.
Balancing that view, however, is the reality that many EM countries are actually in a decent position to weather a world of tighter liquidity and increased uncertainty. Many EM central banks have had a running start in terms of monetary policy tightening, many EM countries have improving current account balances, and many EM currencies are historically undervalued. Foreign positioning in many EM local markets is not overextended. And commodity-exporting countries are benefiting from higher prices, improved terms of trade, and economic growth.
EM equity valuations do appear to be pricing in some risk. EM equities are currently trading at a greater than 30% discount to DM equities. The MSCI EM forward P/E of 11.3 is spot on its long-term average. The spread on the JPM EMBI GD external debt index, currently 435bps, is more than 85bps higher than its 10-year average. The yield on the JPM GBI-EM GD, currently 6.68%, is almost 80bps higher than its 10-year average. Emerging market currencies also remain at attractive levels relative to historical levels and to estimates of fair value.
China’s "Zero-COVID" Policy and lockdown strategy remain a risk to the country’s economic growth. China’s property sector also remains a risk and will continue to be a drag on economic growth in the near term, making the “about 5.5%” GDP growth target for 2022 difficult to reach. Recognizing this, at its April 29 quarterly economic meeting, China’s Politburo vowed to step up stimulus to support the “growth and social” target for 2022 (set in December 2021) and pledged to “go all out to expand domestic demand.” They also vowed to strengthen infrastructure FAI1 and quelled market fears on the regulatory tightening front. Growth concerns in China typically lead to a pause in new regulatory tightening (or to easing), so it appears that peak regulatory tightening is done for now.
The PBoC cut the RRR rate by 25bps to 11.25% on April 25, anticipating the likely economic growth hit from the March Omicron outbreak and the lockdowns that remain in place. The rate cut is a welcome, though measured, policy easing step. The Politburo economic meeting signals a clear stepping up of targeted policy stimulus and should, in the near to medium term, cause China’s credit impulse (which bottomed on the country’s earlier pivot toward gradual policy easing) to move decisively higher. The upturn in credit creation is positive for both industrial commodities and EM equities.
Valuations on Chinese equities have moved lower despite a steady and broadening earnings base — the current 12-month forward P/E is 9.7 (versus 12.0 in April of 2019). Earnings growth for China is expected to rise by over 15% in 2022 and by another 15% in 2023 — this compares favorably with expectations for MSCI EM (10% for both 2022 and 2023), to overall DM (10% for 2022 and 8% for 2023), to the US (just under 10% for both years), and to Europe (10% for 2022 and 5% for 2023).
Stability — political, economic, and social — is key for China this year as President Xi looks to secure a third five-year term at the National Party Congress this fall. China’s Politburo did reiterate that “housing is for living, not for speculation” at its April 29 meeting, although they did give local government more space to ease property policies. We continue to expect gradual and targeted easing of policies to prevent further downside to this sector. Despite this easing, some property companies will likely be allowed to fail, while those deemed systemically important will likely be bailed out by the government.
— Laura Ostrander, Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Manager and Macro Strategist
— Aaron R Hurd, FRM, Senior Portfolio Manager, Currency
1 Fixed-asset investment.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
The views expressed in this material are the views of State Street Global Advisors through the period ended April 29, 2022 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice as such term is defined under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell any investment. It does not take into account any investor’s or potential investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, risk appetite or investment horizon. If you require investment advice you should consult your tax and financial or other professional advisor. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
All the index performance results referred to are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only. It should not be assumed that they represent the performance of any particular investment.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
Bonds generally present less short-term risk and volatility than stocks, but contain interest rate risk (as interest rates raise, bond prices usually fall); issuer default risk; issuer credit risk; liquidity risk; and inflation risk. These effects are usually pronounced for longer-term securities. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to a substantial gain or loss.
Investing in high yield fixed income securities, otherwise known as “junk bonds”, is considered speculative and involves greater risk of loss of principal and interest than investing in investment grade fixed income securities. These lower-quality debt securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to potential changes in the credit quality of the issuer.
Increase in real interest rates can cause the price of inflation-protected debt securities to decrease. Interest payments on inflation protected debt securities can be unpredictable. There are risks associated with investing in Real Assets and the Real Assets sector, including real estate, precious metals and natural resources. Investments can be significantly affected by events relating to these industries.
Investing in foreign domiciled securities may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, withholding taxes, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Investments in emerging or developing markets may be more volatile and less liquid than investing in developed markets and may involve exposure to economic structures that are generally less diverse and mature and to political systems which have less stability than those of more developed countries.
The returns on a portfolio of securities which exclude companies that do not meet the portfolio’s specified ESG criteria may trail the returns on a portfolio of securities which include such companies. A portfolio’s ESG criteria may result in the portfolio investing in industry sectors or securities which underperform the market as a whole.
The MSCI ACWI ESG Universal Index is a trademark of MSCI Inc.
© 2022 State Street Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Exp. Date: 4/30/2023