2023 GICS® Changes: The Impact and What You Need to Know
S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI Inc. announced changes to the Global Industry Classification Standards (GICS) structure that are scheduled to go into effect in March 2023 and involve reclassifying firms across five GICS sectors. While these changes are not as significant as the 2016 and 2018 GICS changes that created new sectors, they will instead trigger industry level changes beneath the surface, as industries are being both eliminated and created.
Investors building and rotating within sector portfolios should be acutely aware of the impact of these changes to the underlying composition of existing market segments across factors and fundamentals.
An Overview of the GICS Changes
Key GICS changes include:
Reclassifying Data & Processing & Outsourced Services companies from Information Technology to Industrials and Financials
Moving select companies that mainly sell consumable merchandise from Consumer Discretionary to Consumer Staples
Based on proforma classifications published by S&P Dow Jones Indices during the consultation period, the changes will impact the composition of five S&P 500 GICS sectors, with around 3% of the S&P 500 Index market cap to be re-classified at the sector level across 14 stocks, as shown below:
Select List of S&P 500 Companies Potentially to be Reclassified
A select list of impacted large-cap companies will be announced by June 30, 2022, and the full list of names impacted up-and-down the cap spectrum will be available before December 15, 2022.
Given the changes and proforma classifications published by S&P Dow Jones Indices during the consultation period, we constructed a new sector map for the S&P 500 to help investors consider the impact of these changes on S&P 500 sector exposures.
To do this, we re-allocated impacted companies to their new sectors and weighted them by market cap to create the proforma sectors. And as shown below, at a high level, the Tech and Financial sectors were significantly impacted by the reclassification of data processing firms. And although the changes to the other sectors result in a less than 1% change in market cap, they are still noteworthy given the names involved (e.g., Target Corp, Automatic Data Processing) and the nuanced impact at the industry level which we cover in the next sections.
Impacts on S&P 500 Sector Exposures
Reclassification of Data Processing & Outsourced Services Companies
Information Technology will see the largest reduction in market capitalization among the 11 GICS sectors as a result of the removal of Data Processing & Outsourced Services stocks, which account for around 11% of the Information Technology sector. The change will make the Information Technology sector more concentrated with the weight of its top 10 positions increasing from 70% to 75%.
Some Data Processing & Outsources Services companies, including two of Tech’s current top 10 positions —Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc — will be re-classified into a newly-created GICS sub-industry: Transaction and Payment Processing Services, under Financials. As a result, Financials will receive the newest names, becoming the second-largest GICS sector in the S&P 500 Index. The Transaction and Payment Processing Services sub-industry will account around 18% of Financials and become the second- largest sub-industry in the sector, trailing the Banks sub-industry.
Other Data Processing & Outsourced Services companies that provide human resource support services, commercial data processing or business outsourcing services — such as Paychex Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. — will move to Industrials, since these business activities are more aligned with business support activities.
While the additions will increase Industrials’ market cap by around $159 billion, they will only slightly increase Industrials’ presence in the S&P 500 Index. But more impactful changes may be at the industry level, as there are currently over 50 firms classified under the existing Data Processing & Outsourced Services Industry in the S&P Total Market Index.1 Some firms moving to Industrials and others going to Financials underscores how nuanced the impacts might be once you leave the S&P 500 and travel further down the cap spectrum or take a finer cut at the industry landscape.
Changes to Retail-Related Industries
As more brick-and-mortar retailers adopt the omni-channel approach to meet changing customer needs, differentiation between internet & direct marketing and brick-and-mortar retailers has become less prominent. To keep up with the evolving retail landscape, S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI Inc. decided to discontinue the Internet & Direct Marketing Retail industry and reclassify companies such as Amazon and eBay into their respective retail industries based on the goods they sell. The Internet & Direct Marketing Retail companies in the S&P 500 will be moved to a newly-created Broadline Retail sub-industry under the same Consumer Discretionary sector. Therefore, there is no impact on the constituents at the sector level.
In addition, retailers such as Target Corp. and Dollar Tree Inc. that generate the majority of their revenue from consumable staple items will be grouped with other hypermarkets and supercenters like Walmart and Costco into a newly created Consumable Merchandise Retail sub-industry under Consumer Staples. The reclassification will increase the market cap of Consumer Staples by $189 billion but barely raise the sector’s weight in the S&P 500 Index.
Impacts on Sector Fundamentals and Macroeconomic Sensitivity
To understand the impacts on sector fundamentals, we took a bottom-up approach by aggregating stock-level fundamentals based on proforma constituent weight in the new sector. We found the impacts on most sectors’ valuations, growth and quality characteristics, as well as beta sensitivity to key macroeconomic indicators, such as 10-year Treasury yields, are minimal because of either the small weights of reclassified companies or their similarity to the new sector they are moving into.
However, a few changes on sector fundamentals are worth highlighting. Despite losing 11% of its market cap, growth stocks continue to dominate the Tech sector, accounting for 73% of the exposure.2 The sector’s historical revenue growth of its underlying companies and their consensus analyst growth estimates for the next three to five years are little changed, as shown in the chart below.
Changes to Tech’s valuation metrics, including price-to-earnings, price-to-sales and price-to-cash-flow, are also muted, although its price-to-book ratio increases by 6%, as the firms removed have fewer intangible assets than the remaining ones.
Financials and Technology Growth
The Financials sector sees greater allocation to growth stocks based on the Morningstar Style Box classification, resulting in higher historical revenue growth at the sector level.
Following the Sector Roadmap Ahead
The current GICS changes are less impactful at the S&P 500 sector level than 2018’s structure changes where companies with greater market cap of the S&P 500 Index changed sector classifications, resulting in significant shifts in sector fundamentals and performance dynamics.
However, these changes to the sector map will result in more nuanced changes at the industry level.
1 Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of 3/23/2022. 2 Morningstar, as of 3/18/2022.
S&P 500 Index: The version of the popular benchmark for US large-cap equities that includes 500 companies from leading industries and captures about 80% coverage of available market capitalization in the US that reflects returns after reinvestment of dividends.
Global Industry Classification Standards (GICS®): A financial-industry guide for classifying industries that is used by investors around the world. The GICS structure consists of 11 sectors, 24 industry groups, 68 industries and 157 sub-industries, and Standard & Poor’s (S&P) has categorized all major public companies into the GICS framework.
The views expressed in this material are the views of SPDR ETFs and SSGA Funds Research Team through the period ended March 31, 2022 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions and do not necessarily represent the views of State Street Global Advisors or any of its affiliates. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
This communication is directed at professional clients The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Index returns do not represent actual ETF performance and are for illustration purposes only. Index performance does not reflect charges and expenses associated with the fund or brokerage commissions associated with buying and selling exchange traded funds. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The Fund is new therefore does not have a performance history of its own.
Index returns reflect capital gains and losses, income, and the reinvestment of dividends.
This communication is not intended to be an investment recommendation or investment advice and should not be relied upon as such.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
Because of their narrow focus, sector funds tend to be more volatile than broadly diversified funds and generally result in greater price fluctuations than the overall market.
All ETFs are subject to risk, including possible loss of principal. Sector ETF products are also subject to sector risk and non-diversification risk, which generally result in greater price fluctuations than the overall market.
Select Sector SPDR Funds bear a higher level of risk than more broadly diversified funds.
While the shares of ETFs are tradable on secondary markets, they may not readily trade in all market conditions and may trade at significant discounts in periods of market stress.
Non-diversified funds that focus on a relatively small number of securities tend to be more volatile than diversified funds and the market as a whole.
Hong Kong: State Street Global Advisors Asia Limited, 68/F, Two International Finance Centre, 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong. T: +852 2103-0288. F: +852 2103-0200.
All forms of investments carry risks, including the risk of losing all of the invested amount. Such activities may not be suitable for everyone. The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
ETFs trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk, fluctuate in market value and may trade at prices above or below the ETFs net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns. Standard & Poor’s®, S&P® and SPDR® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (S&P); Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (Dow Jones); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI) and sublicensed for certain purposes by State Street Corporation. State Street Corporation's financial products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates and third party licensors and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability in relation thereto, including for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index.
This website is issued by State Street Global Advisor Asia Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission ("SFC").