As one of the world’s largest investment managers, each year State Street Global Advisors engages in dialogue with companies about a variety of issues critical to long-term performance – from business strategy to independent board leadership to sustainability. This year we will continue our active engagement with boards on sustainability, but also use our proxy vote to press companies that are falling behind and failing to engage.
ESG: No Longer an Option for Long-Term Strategy
Three years ago, we first called on boards to consider sustainability across the environmental, social and governance (ESG) spectrum. Having already engaged with companies on a number of governance matters for many years, we see that shareholder value is increasingly being driven by issues such as climate change, labor practices, and consumer product safety. We believe that addressing material ESG issues is good business practice and essential to a company’s long-term financial performance – a matter of value, not values.
Sustainability Report Card: Mixed Results for Companies
Over the course of thousands of engagements we have seen some progress. Many directors now acknowledge the importance of ESG issues and understand how it will impact the flow of capital to their companies. Boards more clearly appreciate that issues such as climate change pose risks to their businesses. Directors see that intangible issues such as corporate culture are long-term value drivers – and are aware that shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, and communities alike are factoring these issues into their decision-making. We have also seen companies respond to our call. For example, our Fearless Girl campaign in which we used our voice and vote to encourage companies to increase gender diversity on their boards resulted in 583 companies adding women to their boards or committing to doing so.
Unfortunately, fewer than 25% of the companies we’ve evaluated have meaningfully identified, incorporated and disclosed material ESG issues into their strategies. Meanwhile, some shareholder activists continue to focus on specific or narrow ESG issues in piecemeal fashion – often creating confusion for investors, boards and company leadership without fundamentally tackling the ESG issues material to long-term shareholder performance.
R-Factor™: A New Lens into Company Performance
To begin addressing ESG in a more comprehensive way, this past year we launched R-Factor (the ‘R’ stands for Responsibility), a transparent scoring system that measures the performance of a company’s business operations and governance as it relates to financially material and sector-specific ESG issues. Drawing on data from four leading providers and leveraging the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) materiality framework, R-Factor generates unique ESG scores for over 6,000 listed companies globally and allows us to evaluate a company’s performance against both regional and global industry peers. Indeed, following our endorsement of SASB’s materiality framework as the foundation for R-Factor, a growing number of companies and investors are now using it to guide their ESG public reporting. This is an important development, as the industry seeks to coalesce around common metrics and reporting conventions.
We now use R-Factor to help clients understand their portfolio exposures, as well as inform our own asset stewardship engagements and investment decisions. Key influencers like Bloomberg and SASB have also been using R-Factor to develop industry-specific ESG indices. We believea company’s ESG score will soon effectively be as important as its credit rating.
Voting Against ESG Laggards & Putting Underperformers on Notice With R-Factor informing our decision-making, this year we are prepared to use our proxy voting power to ensure companies are identifying material ESG issues and incorporating the implications into their long-term strategy.
Beginning this proxy season, we will take appropriate voting action against board members at companies in the S&P 500, FTSE 350, ASX 100, TOPIX 100, DAX 30, and CAC 40 indices that are laggards based on their R-Factor scores and that cannot articulate how they plan to improve their score. Beginning in 2022, we will expand our voting action to include those companies who have been consistently underperforming their peers on their R-Factor scores for multiple years, unless we see meaningful change. We believe doing so is in the best interests of investors and companies alike.
For those companies struggling but wanting to take action, we are sharing the attached framework that removes some of the ambivalence directors have about overseeing ESG, providing a roadmap to incorporating sustainability into the company’s long-term strategy. As part of our engagement, we are also making R-Factor scores available to company management.
Making Better Decisions with ESG
Ultimately, we have a fiduciary responsibility to our clients to maximize the probability of attractive long-term returns – and will never hesitate to use our voice and vote to deliver better performance. This is why we are so focused on financially material ESG issues.
I hope you find our perspective and framework helpful. I encourage your company leadership to get your R-Factor score, and I look forward to engaging with you throughout the year.
President and CEO of State Street Global Advisors
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. The offering document should be read for further details including the risk factors. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. ETFs trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk, fluctuate in market value and may trade at prices above or below the ETFs net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
This website is issued by State Street Global Advisor Asia Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission ("SFC").