Our Approach: Active Engagement with Our Portfolio Companies to Promote Long-term Value of Our Clients’ Investments
At State Street Global Advisors, we use a risk-based approach to identifying issues that we believe have the most material impact on the long-term value of our clients’ assets. We elevate outcome-oriented stewardship priorities each year based on factors such as market trends, financial materiality and portfolio impact.
As near-permanent holders of capital, it is our responsibility as fiduciaries to consider elements that may impact long-term value creation. Our asset stewardship program includes:
We engage with companies to drive improved standards and disclosure around financially material risks and opportunities. Our experience in asset stewardship has provided us with important lessons on constructively engaging with companies.
In our view as long-term holders of the companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients, divestment is not an adequate option for investors. Rather than divesting from companies, we believe that engaging with companies to optimize their operations and disclosures is the optimal strategy for mitigating risks posed to our clients’ investments, as well as capturing potential opportunities that may exist.
Our focus begins with governance, as we believe that strong, independent and effective boards of directors can better address the issues affecting long-term strategy. We use sustained, multi-year engagements to drive improved disclosure and standards and seek the long-term preservation of the value of the companies in which we invest.
We believe that our portfolio companies are best suited to understand what issues are most impactful for their business and, therefore, base our priorities for each portfolio company upon ongoing dialogue with company management and boards. Importantly, State Street Global Advisors does not maintain a firmwide divestment policy.
Figure 1 explains our approach to engagement.
Figure 1: Our Engagement Standards
As environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors have risen in importance to the broader market, State Street Global Advisors has seen a rise in shareholder proxy proposals related to sustainability issues. We consider sustainability-related shareholder proposals on a case-by-case basis and analyze many different factors to determine our approach. As such, we only vote in favor of sustainability-related shareholder proposals when we believe it is both reasonable and likely to maximize long-term value for our clients.
With this in mind, we will only consider supporting sustainability-focused shareholder proposals if they address an environmental or social topic we deem to be material to a particular sector. Figure 2 outlines our proxy voting approach, which is meant to help mitigate risks and promote long-term value creation.
As environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors have risen in importance to the broader market, State Street Global Advisors has seen a rise in shareholder proxy proposals related to sustainability issues. We consider sustainability-related shareholder proposals on a case-by-case basis and analyze many different factors to determine our approach. As such, we only vote in favor of sustainability-related shareholder proposals when we believe it is reasonable and will maximize long-term shareholder value for our clients.
With this in mind, we will only consider supporting sustainability-focused shareholder proposals if they address an environmental or social topic deemed to be financially material to a particular sector. Figure 2 outlines our proxy voting approach, which is meant to help mitigate risks and support business practices that create long-term value. Also see our CEO’s letter on our 2022 Proxy Voting Agenda.
Figure 2: Our Proxy Voting Standards
With respect to sustainability-related proposals, see our voting record in Figure 3. For environmental and social proposals, we consider the materiality of the environmental and social factors to the company’s business and sector, the content and intent of the proposal and a company's responsiveness to engagement, among other criteria.
Figure 3: State Street Global Advisors' Record on Environmental and Shareholder Proposals
We are supportive of giving our clients greater choice around how their shares are voted. Today, clients invested through our separately managed account structures have the option to retain proxy voting authority over the securities held in their accounts that we manage for them.
State Street Global Advisors has made proxy voting choices (i.e., the proxy voting program) available to clients invested in certain commingled funds in the US and the UK, in which case a pro rata portion of shares held by the fund attributable to clients who choose to participate in the proxy voting program would be voted consistent with the third-party proxy voting policies selected by the client.
We are continuing to explore the possibility of providing investor choice to more products and client types.
As a long-term shareholder, we will continue to serve as a consistent voice to portfolio company boards and management teams. While we do believe there are benefits in boards considering the voices of long-term shareholders when weighing significant decisions relating to capital allocation and long-term strategy, it is the board’s role — and not investors’ — to determine that strategy.
For example, we believe it is appropriate for us as investors to share what metrics related to climate risk aid us in understanding companies’ exposure to climate transition risk. Conversely, we believe it is not productive for shareholders to micromanage strategy or dictate which assets should be divested. We have publicly shared our concerns of the unintended consequences of inappropriate investor pressure to divest fossil fuel assets.
Another example of how we approach our engagements with companies from a risk rather than an operational lens is our discussions with a pharmaceutical company that received a shareholder proposal asking it to suspend the manufacture of a specific product that was alleged to have carcinogenic properties. We did engage with the company to understand how it was managing the reputational, legal, and financial risks associated with this product. Ultimately, we did not support the proposal because we believe it is the responsibility of regulators — not investors — to determine what products are safe for human health and appropriate for consumer use.
With many portfolio companies improving their shareholder engagement practices and approach to long-term material issues, our support for incumbent directors in contested elections has steadily increased over the last five years, reaching a new high in 2022, as seen in Figure 4. We will continue to foster constructive, long-term relationships with our portfolio companies and serve as a consistent voice to their boards and management teams.
Figure 4: Our Support for Incumbent Directors in Proxy Contests Has Risen
Our Support for Dissidents in Global Proxy Contests, 2017-2022
We are pleased to report that 2022 was a significant year for our corporate engagement activities, including 956 comprehensive engagements across 31 countries. For further information on our 2023 stewardship activities, see our website.
We look forward to continuing to advocate for our clients and to advise and engage with our portfolio companies on material issues that we believe can impact long-term value.
Information Classification: Limited Access
For institutional/professional investors use only.
The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
The returns on a portfolio of securities which exclude companies that do not meet the portfolio’s specified ESG criteria may trail the returns on a portfolio of securities which include such companies. A portfolio’s ESG criteria may result in the portfolio investing in industry sectors or securities which underperform the market as a whole.
Responsible-Factor (R Factor) scoring is designed by State Street to reflect certain ESG characteristics and does not represent investment performance. Results generated out of the scoring model is based on sustainability and corporate governance dimensions of a scored entity.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
The views expressed in this material are the views of Benjamin Colton and Michael Younis through the period ended October 15, 2022 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions.
This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
This communication is directed at professional clients (this includes eligible counterparties as defined by the appropriate EU regulator) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
© 2023 State Street Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.
Expiry Date: April 30, 2024