Incorporating ESG considerations into portfolios is clearly a growing priority for many investors today. Whether driven by regulation, investment beliefs or values — investors are increasingly asking how their indexed or passive investments can adapt to new realities.
Index managers have broadened their toolkits and are able to offer portfolios that no longer just capture the wider market but that have specific objectives, such as efficiently incorporating ESG criteria.
So, how can index managers help investors futureproof their portfolios?
ESG and Performance
First, a word about performance. In a recent paper1 we looked at a number of studies that measured the performance in shares globally over the recent COVID19 crisis period and beyond, and found that there was significant outperformance related to high-scoring ESG stocks over the periods studied.
An HSBC study2 measured the share performance of over 600 public companies globally and found that climate-focused stocks outperformed others by 7.6% from December 2019 going into the crisis period and generally high ESG-scoring shares beat the others by about 7%.
In another study, Morningstar3 found that sustainable and ESG equity indices outperformed conventional indices in the Global, Europe and US Large-Cap categories in the month to March 2020.
In other words these studies suggest that the right ESG-aligned portfolios can provide good downside protection and a useful uptick in performance.
Now, let’s go on to consider the four key ways that ESG criteria can be successfully incorporated into index portolios.
Screening Out to Improve ESG Profile
Investors make wide use of exclusions to keep their ESG incorporation simple and manageable. In fact, out of the $30+ trillion in global ESG-labelled assets,4 the majority were in exclusionary screens, either norms- or investment-led.
In Europe, exclusion still represents more than 50% of total ESG assets,5 even if approaches such as integration and best in class have been growing at a faster pace.
The Returns Question
For many investor the question arises: am I harming my return potential by excluding companies from my investable universe? A 2017 paper from MSCI6 seems to suggest that some level of exclusions are not harmful to performance. In fact, it may even be moderately positive if those exclusions are concentrated on the worst types of corporate wrongdoing.
Also, larger companies do seem to be impacted more by negative events. Investors that use market-cap-weighted indices, where allocations to companies are determined by their size, should be particularly mindful of that.
Getting the Exclusions Right
An important consideration for any investor is how the exclusion list should be defined. While screening may sound relatively simple, the process involves a significant amount of judgment on the part of the asset manager and/or their investors, and potentially the data provider with whom they partner to conduct the screening.
We believe that to be optimal, a screening process should have the following characteristics:
be systematic and transparent;
be aware of the potential impact on an investors’ risk and return objectives;
be consistent but not inflexible; and finally
leverage best-in-class data. This may necessitate using multiple providers.
We see exclusions as a straightforward way for investors to remove securities that could potentially be damaging to performance because of reputational risk (worst offenders) and/or changes in regulation/consumer preferences.
2 Best In Class
Improving the ESG Characteristics of a Given Exposure
In a best-in-class approach, one is looking for an improvement in the ESG characteristics of a given market or exposure. This approach will tilt the portfolio towards companies with higher ESG scores and away from the weaker scorers.
The rationale here is not only to reduce risk (by tilting away from poor scorers) but also to potentially enhance returns (by tilting towards high scorers). There is an underlying belief that companies with better ESG scores will deliver better returns over the long term. Research7 has shown that improved performance can be operational, at cost of capital level and share price.
In this approach, investors will ultimately have a portfolio that has a higher ESG score than their initial investable universe. To do that, indices need both ESG scores and a portfolio construction approach that will differ from standard market cap-weighted methodologies.
The Importance of Scores
There are many different providers of ESG scores and this can lead to confusion, especially when — as is often the case — scores differ. Investors need to do their own due diligence and understand what are the key methodological choices that underpin a specific approach.
We have identified three primary points of differentiation:
Which factors/metrics are material for an investor to determine a company’s future financial performance?
Data Acquisition and Estimation Use of different sources (Where does the data comes from? How is that data is acquired?) and different estimation methods (How do they overcome data gaps?)
Aggregation and Weighting Each data provider has developed proprietary methods to aggregate and weight ESG metrics in order to derive their summary scores.
Despite the data challenges, we are seeing an increase in demand for best-in-class approaches as investors become more comfortable with research results and the number of available solutions increases. From a practical implementation perspective, this approach can used to tilt either standard indexed or smart beta approaches.
Focusing on Specific ESG Themes
Thematic approaches allow investors to be more granular in terms of the ESG improvement or goal they target. Here, the investment is focused on specific themes. This approach has grown in popularity as investors increasingly seek to align their portfolios with their convictions or to have a more immediate impact on specific topics.
There’s a wide variety of themes that can be targeted by investors in passive or indexed portfolios. Currently, we’re seeing great demand for climate and carbon indices, but investors are also looking for indexed solutions that address wider societal concerns such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals, health products and human rights.
Another Dimension of Success
Thematic approaches move the discussion from the pure risk/return spectrum to frameworks which include other measures of success. When considering these approaches, investors will need to think about how their oversight and governance may change, in order to fully capture the desired outcomes. For example, they may transition from simple additional reporting (Is my carbon footprint lower than before?) to more qualitative (Is my strategy influencing change at the right level within an organisation?)
The Final Evolution
As ESG considerations grow evermore present in investment decisions, ultimately integration will be at a level that we are no longer talking about ESG per se. All investing will be ESG investing. ESG metrics will no longer be considered to be an additional, discrete (and at times optional) input but will be part-and-parcel of all investment decisions.
At this point, it would not so much be that ESG would be considered an option for a passive or indexed investor, but rather that ESG data would be an explicit means to generate alpha in an active approach. The idea here is that investors can make better investments by incorporating financial and non-financial/ESG data in their decisions.
Sourcing quality data will be key, given that selecting securities based on quantitative and qualitative assessment of ESG factors, requires analyst expertise. As data disclosure improves in breadth and consistency, managers will have a broader, and better, set of inputs at their disposal.
There are many routes to effectively incorporating ESG considerations into indexed portfolios. In fact, through indexing, investors have more flexibility to incorporate their own views and possible constraints compared to more active strategies.
Thinking to the Future ESG consideration is no longer optional for most investors and it makes sense to begin a structured journey towards increasingly incorporating ESG into portfolos. The good news is that index managers have a wider toolkit than ever before and can work with investors to better shape their allocations, help them through the decision process and identify what is the most suitable ESG approach for their investments.
1 COVID-19 and ESG: Four Dimensions, Carlo Funk, SSGA 2020.
2 ESG stocks did best in COVID-19 slump, Ashim Paun (2020).
3 How ESG ETFs Have Performed in the Sell-Off, Briegel Leitao (2020).
4 GSI, 2018 Global Sustainable Investment Review
5 Eurosif, European SRI Study, 2018
6 MSCI, Have corporate controversies helped or hurt performance?, Journal of Environmental Investing 8, (2017
7 Clarck, Feiner, and Viehs, From the Stockholder to the Stakeholder – How Sustainability Can Drive Financial Outperformance, Arabesque Partners (2015)
About State Street Global Advisors
Our clients are the world’s governments, institutions and financial advisors. To help them achieve their financial goals we live our guiding principles each and every day:
Start with Rigour We take a highly disciplined and risk-aware approach built on exhaustive research, careful analysis and market-tested experience to meet client needs. Rigor is behind
every decision we make.
Build from Breadth Today’s investment problems demand a breadth of capabilities. We build from a universe of active and index strategies to create cost-effective solutions.
Invest as Stewards We help our portfolio companies see that what is fair for people and sustain-able for the planet can deliver long-term performance. As fiduciaries, we believe good
stewardship is good investing.
Invent the Future We created the first ETF in the US and are pioneers in index, active, and ESG investing. Using data, insights and investment skill, we are always inventing new ways to invest.
For four decades, these principles have helped us be the quiet power in a tumultuous investing world. Helping millions of people secure their financial futures. This takes each of our employees in 27 offices around the world, and a firm-wide conviction that we can always do it better. As a result, we are the world’s third-largest asset manager with US $2.69 trillion* under our care.
* AUM reflects approximately $50.01 billion USD (as of March 31, 2020), with respect to which State Street Global Advisors Funds Distributors, LLC (SSGA FD) serves as marketing agent; SSGA FD and State Street Global Advisors are affiliated.
Marketing Communication For investment professional use only.
State Street Global Advisors Worldwide Entities For a complete list of SSGA entities, please visit:
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. The views expressed in this material are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The targets and estimates are based on certain assumptions and there is no guarantee that the estimates will be achieved. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners.
Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent. For South Africa Investors: State Street is required to have a complaints process and complaints can be directed to SA-RiskandCompliance@statestreet.com. Any complaints that cannot be satisfactorily resolved by the provider may be referred to the Office of the Ombud for Financial Services Providers in accordance with section 26 of the Act read with the applicable provisions of the Rules on Proceedings of the Office of the Ombud for Financial Services Providers in Board Notice 81 of 2003.
For EMEA Investors: This communication is directed at professional clients (this includes eligible counterparties as defined by the appropriate EU regulator) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication. The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This information is for informational purposes only, not to be construed as investment advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment manager or to invest in a fund. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s), are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients. There are no guarantees regarding the achievement of investment objectives, target returns, portfolio construction, allocations or measurements such as alpha, tracking error, stock weightings and other information ratios. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors. SSGA does not provide tax or legal advice. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Investing entails risks and there can be no assurance that SSGA will achieve profits or avoid incurring losses.
Performance quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so you may have a gain or loss when shares are sold. Current performance may be higher or lower than that quoted.
Images of NYSE Group, Inc. are used with permission of NYSE Group, Inc. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies sponsor, approve of or endorse the contents of this program. Neither NYSE Group, Inc. nor its affiliated companies recommend or make any representation as to possible benefits from any securities or investments.