From Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) statistics to the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, there is extensive data measuring savings adequacy and retirement system effectiveness. While these studies provide a quantitative baseline and enable a common starting point, our goal is to look beyond quantitative measures to understand how people truly feel.
Guided by GR3 survey respondents’ retirement realities, we scrutinized the gap between saving sufficiency and sentiment and explored alternative variables to the happiness formula.
Today, many countries moving from a traditional Defined Benefit (DB) structure to a Defined Contribution (DC) model are experiencing transformational retirement reforms that are introducing confusion and doubt to savers; confusion about how the new systems work and doubt as to whether they do. While the systems themselves may be strong and the reforms directed toward public good, savers’ uncertainty erodes this critical dimension of trust.
Beyond believing that the system works, workers must understand and embrace their role within it to truly gain the value that savings structures have to offer. Here, we are defining ownership of the retirement readiness experience not as investment mastery, but instead, as a willingness to be present and engaged in one’s retirement planning.
Within the GR3 survey, we asked a range of questions to ascertain attitudes regarding ownership, and distilled the results into three themes: responsibility, choice and advice.
Responsibility is the governing indicator for ownership and most evident in countries where the DC construct is well-established.
The level of savers’ choice is largely a factor of the savings system, meaning choice scores are higher in mature DC countries and lower in countries still in transition from guaranteed savings structures.Advice, however, offers unique insight. Respondents in the US, Australia and Ireland are much more likely to seek advice, and be prepared to pay for it, than those in continental Europe. This may be partly due to the legacy of the state-based European systems versus individual-centric Anglo-Saxon approaches —though advice and payment appetites don’t strictly follow this assumption, as evidenced by the UK. An interesting aside: While Swedes are reluctant to seek advice, and expect such advice to be free, they rank highest among the continental countries in terms of accepting individual responsibility for retirement saving.
Here preparedness is defined as individuals’ assessment of whether they have enough to support a comfortable retirement. What constitutes enough can be difficult to evaluate, particularly across countries; therefore, we invited respondents to rank their sense of financial preparedness for retirement. The US led with the highest ranking responses, with a third citing extreme confidence.
Accumulated assets play an important role in determining retirement readiness. But as expressed by survey respondents, people in the best-funded systems are not necessarily the happiest. Instead, savers, sponsors and societies would be better served by an examination of and investment in bettering trust, ownership, and preparedness to further confidence, empowerment, and accountability across the retirement savings complex.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice as such term is defined under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell any investment. It does not take into account any investor's or potential investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, risk appetite or investment horizon. If you require investment advice you should consult your tax and financial or other professional advisor.
The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such
The views expressed in this material are the views of SSGA Defined Contribution as at April 30, 2018, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions.
This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. Investing involves risk, including the risk of loss of principal. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents
disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.
© 2019 State Street Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Exp: July 31, 2022