The World Is Flat & Other Dangerous TDF Investing Myths

All Target Date Funds Are Active

When it comes to target-date selection, there is a growing concern that the retirement industry is falling back on outdated thinking, creating false distinctions between “active” and “passive” TDF suites. Indexing giants that offer target-date solutions utilize index funds as their underlying building blocks to access appropriate asset classes in an efficient, cost-effective manner. However, this doesn’t mean that these target-date suites arepassive strategies.

Leading retirement plan specialist advisors are cutting through the TDF myths, analyzing the full TDF universe utilizing rigorous screens to serve their sponsor clients:

• Asset Allocation and Style Consistency
• Performance
• Fees

There is Variation Across TDF Managers

Nearly half of target-date providers use a custom benchmark for each vintage in their series. This wide range of custom benchmarks highlights the active management decision making—such as which asset classes to use and asset allocation across target date vintages —that occurs across the universe of TDF managers.

While custom benchmarks are useful goalposts for TDF portfolio managers and client communication, they are little help to advisors who are looking to compare the performance of two target-date series. To do so, advisors need to dig under the hood, regardless of whether a target-date solution is managed by a traditionally active or index shop.

TDFs Are Not All Created Equally

Performance comes under greater scrutiny in down market cycles. However, it’s the fund methodology and risk profiles —not active vs. index-based approaches —that separate the stars from the sinkers. As shown in Figure 2, State Street was able to out-perform leading index managers during 2008’s Financial Crisis and reduce fund volatility thanks in part to our lower investment fees and our approach to glidepath construction and asset allocation.

Over Time, Alpha Increases Performance

The State Street Target Retirement Series’ glidepath construction and lower investment fees havetranslated into superior performance, despite the fact that index-based target-date funds don’t gain potential alpha from underlying funds. Figure 3 illustrates this returns trend over a 10-year period.

Fees Matter in the “Active” vs. “Passive” Debate

Considering fees and investment expenses are both a plan fiduciary’s responsibility and a critical dimension for evaluating actively managed and index-based TDFs —and there is no reason to pay more. In fact, while out-performing the competition, the State Street Target Retirement series costs less (at 13 bps) than 97% of target-date suites in the market.¹ Advisors who are able to provide their plan participants with an institutional quality glidepath, exposure to a broad set of asset classes, and lower fees may be able to convert and deepen theirrelationships.

State Street is a Cut Above the Rest

SSGA has a demonstrated track record:

See how we define our 4 corners of differentiation:

1. Strategic Indexed Investment Approach

An index investing approach offers investors portfolio diversity without the bias or premiums associated with stock picking strategies. Thanks to our indexing heritage, State Street has been able to outperform our peers, even in down markets.⁴

2.“Through” Glidepath

Evolving to address the risks at each stage of a participant’s journey, our glidepath management is driven by academic research and a deep understanding of participant behavior —at and through retirement.

3. Well-Diversified Asset Class Exposure

With 11 underlying asset classes⁵—that’s double what other leading managers offer—State Street provides a granular asset allocation that’s designed to better perform in the various market environments encountered on the winding road to retirement.

4. Array of Investment Options

Because one size doesn’t fit all, State Street offers both mutual funds (A, I and K share classes) and collective investment trusts (providing multiple share classes with varying fee structures), enabling greater choice for plan sponsors.