Skip to main content
Mind on the Market

Looking beyond traditional asset classes

As companies stay private longer and large technology firms acquire emerging businesses, investors may need to evaluate innovation exposure across the entire portfolio, not just by asset class.

5 min read
Senior Investment Strategist

Over the last 20 years, the sector composition of large-cap equities has changed dramatically, led by a substantial increase in Information Technology and a decline in several traditional sectors, including Financials, Energy, and Consumer Staples. Small-cap sector weights, by contrast, have remained relatively stable, with more modest shifts across industries. In an environment where concentration risk is increasingly being scrutinized, small caps may provide exposure to a more balanced and economically representative segment of the US market, potentially complementing the growing concentration found within large-cap indexes.

Weekly Highlights 

Source: Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg, Preqin, World Gold Council, J.P. Morgan, MSCI, State Street Investment Management, as of March 31, 2026. The Global Market Portfolio 2026 | State Street.

Following the exposure, not the asset class

Recent IPO headlines suggest that innovation is returning to public markets. In reality, they may be highlighting a deeper structural change in how investors access innovation. Many of today's most valuable growth companies remain private longer, while others are acquired by large public companies before ever becoming meaningful index constituents. From a Total Portfolio Approach perspective, this raises a fundamental question: where does innovation exposure reside today?

For decades, investors could gain exposure to much of the corporate growth lifecycle through public markets. Young companies raised capital, completed an IPO, entered small-cap benchmarks, and, if successful, eventually graduated into mid-cap and large-cap indices. Small-cap investing provided access not only to economic growth, but also to future corporate leaders.

Today, however, that pathway continues to change. The growth of venture capital, private equity, and private credit has enabled companies to remain private for longer periods of time, allowing a larger share of value creation to occur before a company ever reaches a public index. Recent IPO activity is therefore less important for the individual companies involved than for what it reveals about the evolving relationship between public and private markets.

The effect is increasingly visible in public equity benchmarks. Technology now accounts for roughly one-third of the S&P 500, while representing a much smaller share within small-cap indices, where financials, industrials, healthcare, and other domestically oriented businesses make up a larger portion of the index.

While innovation remains a defining characteristic of the economy, it is less prominent within the public small-cap universe than many investors might expect.

Historically, investors often viewed small-cap equities as a source of emerging growth opportunities. Today, however, small-cap indices increasingly resemble a portfolio of domestic cyclical businesses rather than a collection of tomorrow's technology leaders. Small-cap stocks continue to play an important role within portfolios, but that role may have evolved.

The reason extends beyond companies remaining private for longer. Large technology firms have become some of the most important acquirers of innovation. Rather than progressing from startup to IPO to small-cap index constituent before eventually reaching large-cap status, many emerging businesses are acquired while still private or shortly after reaching scale.

As a result, investors may increasingly gain exposure to innovation through the large-cap companies that acquire, integrate, and commercialize new technologies. The economic benefits generated by intellectual property, engineering talent, software capabilities, and new business models are ultimately reflected in the earnings power of the acquiring firms.

If innovation has shifted locations, the implications extend beyond debates over public versus private markets. Traditional asset-allocation frameworks often focus on asset-class categories such as public equity, private equity, venture capital, small caps, or large caps. A Total Portfolio Approach instead focuses on the economic exposures embedded across the entire portfolio.

Some of the relevant questions become:

  • How much innovation exposure do we own?
  • How much cyclical economic exposure do we own?
  • How much inflation-sensitive exposure do we own?
  • What’s the interest-rate sensitivity across the portfolio?
  • How liquid is my portfolio?

Those exposures may now reside in multiple places simultaneously. Innovation exposure can come from venture capital, private equity, or public companies that fund, acquire, and scale new technologies. For investors seeking to diversify innovation exposure beyond concentrated large-cap equities, opportunities may also exist across private credit, infrastructure supporting the AI buildout, data-center real estate, commodity inputs required to expand computing capacity, and even segments of public credit markets. Likewise, cyclical exposure may come from public small-cap equities, private businesses, real assets, or credit markets. Understanding aggregate exposure is increasingly more important than focusing on where it sits.

The resurgence of IPO activity serves as a reminder that the traditional boundaries between public and private markets have become increasingly blurred. From a Total Portfolio perspective, the key asset-allocation challenge is not deciding between public and private markets. Rather, it is understanding the aggregate exposures embedded across the portfolio and ensuring that innovation, growth, and cyclical risk are represented in the desired proportions, regardless of where those exposures reside.

Source: FactSet, S&P, State Street Investment Management. Data as of 6/30/2026 unless otherwise stated. The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk, including the risk of loss of principal.

Go beyond the headlines...

Skimmed the summary? Dive deeper with the full PDF—your go-to for weekly market insights and analysis.

More Mind on the Markets