Expectations suggest that the end of the Fed’s rate hiking cycle could be nearing. US investment grade credit has seen a material re-pricing and, looking at the previous hiking cycle (2016-2018), this exposure started to gain traction once markets believed the final rate hike had taken place. Is it now time to revisit investment grade credit?
Central banks continue to focus on inflation, with the ECB, Fed and BoE all opting to hike rates. As such, they have tried to put some space between the objectives of monetary policy (controlling inflation) and the task of managing issues in the banking system. However, tighter credit conditions as a result of the challenges in the banking sector do change the dynamic for the economy. So while the immediate crisis may have abated, central banks largely concede that tighter credit conditions point to the top to the monetary policy cycle being close at hand.
The issues in the banking sector have not been easy for asset markets to navigate. There are now real fears that the policy tightening that has already been delivered, coupled with tighter credit conditions, could tip growth into negative territory. On the back of this worry, there has been a risk-off switch to more defensive strategies, such as money market funds, but the point of maximum pressure seems to have passed with markets now more stable.
Although risks remain, US investment grade bonds have undergone a material re-pricing. Spreads to Treasuries blew out to the wides seen in October 2022, the point of peak bearishness in markets. Spreads have reversed some of that move but remain at 145bp for the Bloomberg US Corporate Index, well above the 115bp it hit in early February and 20bp wide to the 10-year average. This gives the index a yield to worst of close to 5.2%.
Credit spreads therefore offer some protection against a US economic slowdown. This spread to the underlying ‘risk-free rate’ is one component of returns, the other being what happens to underlying Treasury yields. This is typically dependent on the stage of the monetary policy cycle and, as already indicated, expectations are that the end of the Fed rate cycle is close.
While each cycle is different, Figure 1 shows the 2016-2018 Fed tightening cycle and how, during that cycle, returns from the Bloomberg US Corporate Index were fairly flat until late 2018. Positive returns from the index started to feed through in a more sustained manner once the market seemed sure that the final hike was in place. Gains stretched through into 2020, only undergoing a serious correction as markets priced in the big hit to GDP from COVID. A large part of those returns came from the rally in the underlying Treasury curve.
Figure 1: US Corporate Returns Gained Traction as the Last Fed Hike of the 2016-2018 Cycle Came
Higher sector weightings for financials are common within ESG strategies given the better ESG profile that the sector typically enjoys. If bank profitability is impaired, this threatens to be another factor that could weigh on ESG performance. Looking at four of the most widely used ESG indices, their average weight in banking bonds is just more than 30%, which is over 6% higher than the market-weighted index1. It is no surprise that only one of those four indices has outperformed the Bloomberg US Corporate Index year to date and that was mainly because of its longer duration2.
The Bloomberg SASB ESG Ex-Controversies Select indices take a different approach to sector allocations. Once issuers that derive significant revenue from certain practices, industries or product lines have been excluded from the parent index, the index is optimised. In addition to aiming to maximise the ESG score, the optimisation process targets risk characteristics for the new index and tries to align them with the parent index.
With respect to sector allocations, the objective is to target Bloomberg Class 2 sector weights that are within 200bp of the parent index. This results in a financials weight that is just 9bp from the parent weight and a banking sector weight that is only 76bp above that of the parent index. This could help to reduce any performance drag emanating from a high weighting in banks. Indeed, returns year to date have been 4bp higher for the Bloomberg SASB US Corporates ESG Ex-Controversies Select Index than for the market-weighted Bloomberg US Corporate Index3.
1 Four indices used: Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate SRI Total Return Index, Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Sustainability SRI Index, Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI Index, Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates Sustainable Total Return Index. In comparison with the Bloomberg US Corporate Index. Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., weights as of 1 March 2023.
2 Returns year to date: Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate SRI Total Return Index 3.06%, Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Sustainability SRI Index 3.01%, Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI Index 3.01%, Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates Sustainable Total Return Index 3.72% versus Bloomberg US Corporate Index 3.11%. Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of 22 March 2023. The Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates Sustainable Total Return Index has a duration of 7.38 versus 7.02 for the Bloomberg US Corporate Index. Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of 01 March 2023.
3 Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. as of 22 March 2023.
Marketing Communication. General Access. For professional investor use only.
Standard & Poor’s, S&P and SPDR are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (S&P); Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (Dow Jones); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI) and sublicensed for certain purposes by State Street Corporation. State Street Corporation’s financial products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates and third party licensors and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability in relation thereto, including for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice as such term is defined under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell any investment. It does not take into account any investor's or potential investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, risk appetite or investment horizon. If you require investment advice you should consult your tax and financial or other professional advisor.
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
ETFs trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk and will fluctuate in market value. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate in value, so that when shares are sold or redeemed, they may be worth more or less than when they were purchased. Although shares may be bought or sold on an exchange through any brokerage account, shares are not individually redeemable from the fund. Investors may acquire shares and tender them for redemption through the fund in large aggregations known as “creation units.” Please see the fund’s prospectus for more details.
Past Performance is not a guarantee of future results.
This communication is directed at professional clients (this includes eligible counterparties as defined by the appropriate EU regulator or Swiss Regulator) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments.
The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
Bonds generally present less short-term risk and volatility than stocks, but contain interest rate risk (as interest rates raise, bond prices usually fall); issuer default risk; issuer credit risk; liquidity risk; and inflation risk. These effects are usually pronounced for longer-term securities. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to a substantial gain or loss.
Investing in high yield fixed income securities, otherwise known as "junk bonds", is considered speculative and involves greater risk of loss of principal and interest than investing in investment grade fixed income securities. These Lower-quality debt securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to potential changes in the credit quality of the issuer.
There are risks associated with investing in Real Assets and the Real Assets sector, including real estate, precious metals and natural resources. Investments can be significantly affected by events relating to these industries.
International Government bonds and corporate bonds generally have more moderate short-term price fluctuations than stocks, but provide lower potential long-term returns.
Flows are as of the date indicated, are subject to change, and should not be relied upon as current thereafter.
Investing in commodities entail significant risk and is not appropriate for all investors. Commodities investing entail significant risk as commodity prices can be extremely volatile due to wide range of factors. A few such factors include overall market movements, real or perceived inflationary trends, commodity index volatility, international, economic and political changes, change in interest and currency exchange rates.
Investing in foreign domiciled securities may involve risk of capital loss from unfavourable fluctuation in currency values, withholding taxes, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations. Investments in emerging or developing markets may be more volatile and less liquid than investing in developed markets and may involve exposure to economic structures that are generally less diverse and mature and to political systems which have less stability than those of more developed countries.
The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU). This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
© 2023 State Street Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.