Internal succession may offer a higher degree of continuity across the practice and enable advisors to maintain long-standing relationships and values. But identifying and developing a successor can be challenging. Consider these steps towards an internal succession to ensure a smooth transition for clients and staff.
Internal succession is often viewed as the most straightforward path for transitioning a practice. In reality, it is one of the most demanding—and most valuable—approaches when used not just to transfer ownership, but to build a more durable, scalable business over time.
More than one-third (35%) of financial advisors plan to retire or scale back within the next decade. Yet, among those nearing this transition, 26% remain uncertain about how their succession will take shape.1
While practice ownership transitions can be complex, internal succession offers a compelling path—one that supports continuity for clients and staff and gives advisory owners the flexibility to either fully retire or remain involved in a limited capacity.
When comparing internal succession to a direct sale, merger, or acquisition, internal succession often results in a higher degree of continuity for clients and staff. It also offers the advisory owner the flexibility to either fully retire or maintain a limited role.
It requires deliberate effort to identify and develop the right successor model, and it has implications across the entire practice. Without a thoughtful approach, the absence of a well-matched successor can put client relationships, practice continuity, and even your own transition plans at risk. To execute a successful transition, it's important to understand what it takes to effectively develop an internal successor and what a realistic timeline for that handover may look like.
Figure 1: Succession plan for all industry advisors transitioning within 10 years
| Succession plan for all industry advisors transitioning within 10 years | Number of advisors | Percent of advisors in transition | Assets ($B) | Percent of assets in transition | AUM per advisor ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing advisor in the same practice | 21630 | 21.2% | 3300.4 | 22.8% | 152.6 |
Junior advisor or family member | 19982 | 19.5% | 3039 | 21.0% | 152.1 |
External sale | 15504 | 15.2% | 1613.7 | 11.1% | 104.1 |
Clients reassigned by firm | 16696 | 16.3% | 2250 | 15.5% | 134.8 |
Unsure | 27584 | 27.0% | 4000.8 | 27.6% | 145 |
Other | 834 | 0.8% | 291.8 | 2.0% | 349.9 |
Total transitions within 10 years | 102230 | -- | 14495.7 | -- | 141.8 |
Source: Cerulli Associates, U.S. Advisor Metrics 2025, Collaborating for Sustainable Organic Growth. Assets in transition, 2024. Cerulli Associates, Investment Company Institute, Insured Retirement Institute, Investment News, Judy Diamond, Department of Labor, PLANSPONSOR, S&P Capital IQ MMD, Financial Planning, Financial Advisor Magazine, and Investment Advisor Magazine | Analyst Note: Advisors were asked in Cerulli’s annual survey of retail financial advisors the number of years until they expect to retire. The assets in transition model segments advisors based on the number of years indicated. In some instances, advisors may retire unexpectedly at an earlier age. In other instances, advisors may ballpark 10 years, but they may decide to extend that timeframe at a later point.
To orchestrate a successful handover, it's important to understand what it takes to effectively develop an internal successor—and what a realistic timeline for that handover may look like.
Hiring and developing team members through the lens of succession is one of the most important—and often most complex—challenges advisory owners face. Internal succession is often viewed as the more straightforward option, leading many owners to favor internal candidates over external buyers. In fact, one in five advisors plan to transition their business to a junior advisor or family member upon retirement.2
Given the scale of expected retirements, this decision has far-reaching implications—not only for continuity but for the transfer of an estimated 40% of industry assets.3 For internal succession to succeed, the strategy must be deliberate and forward-looking. The goal is not simply to identify a successor—it is to develop the next generation of leadership while strengthening the practice itself.
While an internal successor offers a high degree of continuity for clients and staff due to their first-hand knowledge of the business and familiarity with clients, the perfect internal candidate to lead the practice forward doesn’t always exist. Or, your preferred successor may lack the necessary capital to buy the practice on your desired timeline.
In many cases, relying on a single successor introduces concentration risk where leadership, client relationships, and institutional knowledge are overly dependent on one individual.
A more durable approach is to define a succession model that aligns with the complexity and needs of the practice. For some, this may be a single successor. For others, it may involve a team-based structure that distributes responsibility across multiple individuals.
Regardless of the approach, the objective is the same: to build continuity over time by expanding shared ownership of client relationships, developing leadership capacity, and reducing dependency on any one person.
This is where taking a team-based approach to managing human capital can help build continuity well ahead of a business transition—by promoting a shared sense of ownership over client relationships. To help ensure your team development efforts are effective, assess the following questions:
Leading practices also document critical processes—from client onboarding to investment implementation—to support continuity and ease leadership transition.
Of all the transition options, internal succession requires the longest runway. It takes time to identify and develop a successor—which is why we recommend a minimum of five years to see this option through.
A thoughtful timeline also allows you to develop more than one team member, which could reduce the risks of relying on a single successor and strengthen your overall bench.
Years 1–2
Years 3–5+
Succession planning touches every part of the business: client outcomes, employee retention, growth trajectory, and even regulatory responsibility. With advisor retirements accelerating and client expectations rising, the window for thoughtful succession planning is narrowing. But done right, succession is an ongoing discipline—not a one-time event.
When approached thoughtfully, an internal succession pathway is more than a transition strategy—it is a way to strengthen the foundation of the practice. By developing talent, expanding team capabilities, and gradually transferring responsibility, advisors can build a practice that is positioned to grow, adapt, and endure across generations.
For more succession insights, download “Succession, Scale, Capabilities, or a Combination? Evaluating Succession Opportunities.”