Algorithmic insights can provide valuable input into the direction of credit market valuations. The scope of data inputs into these algorithms is broad, crossing fixed income and equities, fundamentals and technicals, and market pricing. Using these insights, quantitative analysts can help fixed income market participants identify upside potential and avoid securities with comparatively poor performance prospects.
In this article, we provide information about three data signals that are used to construct actively managed fixed income portfolios in our first systematic active strategies, which we are offering in US Dollar Investment Grade Credit. Our systematic strategies will be implemented using algorithmic security and issuer selection signals provided to State Street Global Advisors via systematic strategy indices by Barclays Quantitative Portfolio Strategy (QPS), a provider of industry-leading quantitative portfolio research.
Below, we detail how these three signals can complement each other in a combined strategy.
The three signals that form the core of our systematic approach are based on relative value, momentum, and sentiment factors, in the corporate bond market.
The relative value signal is designed to identify mispriced bonds. Relative value has long been used by credit investors to identify attractive opportunities across corporate issuers in a given sector. The quantitative value score has benefits compared with a fundamental approach because it can cover a wide range of securities and analyze a large number of corporate bonds simultaneously.
This signal is based on rules that attribute observed bond spreads to issuers’ fundamentals and peer characteristics, including rating, sector, and maturity. The part of the spread that is not attributed to those characteristics forms the basis for the relative value signal. In a given sector and rating group of the US investment grade universe, the algorithm identifies bonds that trade cheap to their peers, after controlling for risk characteristics and fundamentals.
The relative value signal tends to be stable as corporate bond mispricings correct slowly. A higher signal value means that a bond trades at a steeper discount to its peers after accounting for fundamentals. Such mispricing tends to correct over time, leading to outperformance of value bonds over their peers. Historical data shows that diversified portfolios of undervalued bonds with high relative-value scores have persistently outperformed otherwise similar portfolios of bonds with low value scores.
We use a cross-asset momentum signal that is based on equity performance for each respective corporate bond issuer. It allows investors to differentiate credit issuers by their past equity performance. It helps to identify issuers that may exhibit improving prospects, reflected by positive equity returns, or declining prospects, demonstrated by poor equity returns (Figure 1).
Figure 1: The Equity Market Performance of an Issuer Can Give Insights Into Future Performance of its Credit Securities
|Cross Momentum Signal Capturing Equity Momentum Premium in Credit|
|Relative Performance of Issuer Stocks|
Source: Barclays QPS Research.
Empirical results indicate that historically there has been a strong positive relationship between an issuer’s past equity returns and the subsequent returns of its corporate bonds. Our analysis showed that bonds of companies with strong relative equity performance usually outperformed their peers with weak or negative equity returns.
The equity momentum signal reflects the information spillover from equities to corporate bonds. The credit market tends to react with a lag to changes in a company’s fundamentals. There are several reasons why equity momentum leads performance in corporate bonds:
Historical backtesting data suggests that equity momentum works well in combination with relative value because combining the two signals helps avoid “value traps” — issuers that are cheap for a reason, as reflected in weak or negative equity returns. In other words, negative equity momentum can provide credit investors with an early warning for credit performance declines.
Importantly, the equity momentum signal tends to be a contra-cyclical signal that often works well in credit down cycles, as it helps differentiate between vulnerable issuers and those that have better prospects of recovery.
One of the indicators of the sentiment of sophisticated investors about the future prospects of a company is their short position. Actively shorted names as measured by their equity short interest tend to underperform the market. This cross-asset signal applies to credit.
Equity shorting is implemented by investors borrowing a stock and selling it in the market. They buy the stock back later at a lower price in order to return it to the original owner, thereby benefiting from any price decline. They can implement bearish views by shorting individual stocks.
High levels of equity short interest have long been documented to predict low future stock returns. Empirical results indicate that this applies to corporate bonds. We find a consistent negative relationship between equity short interest and subsequent bond returns across geographies and rating segments. Issuers with significant short interest are risky and tend to underperform their peers.
This signal is constructed from information on equity shorting activity collected daily. It considers several parameters of the stock lending market for a more accurate interpretation of short interest, which is very helpful when stocks are difficult to borrow.
Each security will have three scores, reflecting the strength of each signal, and a composite score, based on a weighted combination of the three. (This composite score combines the relative value, momentum, and sentiment signals.) A systematic strategy selects securities with high composite scores, subject to a set of constraints that ensure the risk characteristics of the portfolio remains aligned with those of the benchmark index (see Building a Portfolio: A Closer Look at Our Process).
An important characteristic of these signals is that they have low correlation with each other and can therefore effectively complement each other to provide a positive and stable performance relative to the benchmark.
Our historical backtesting suggests that these three signals had low pairwise correlation consistently across all market regimes, which resulted in a relatively stable alpha and moderate drawdowns in our sample portfolios. The diversification benefits were especially apparent in historical market stress periods such as the Great Financial Crisis and the start of the COVID crisis in 2020. The low correlations stem from two sources: The signals capture different investment styles (momentum/relative value/sentiment), and they reflect information gleaned from different sources and from different markets (equity and credit).
Barclays QPS tested the efficacy of the combined signals using bonds with different liquidity profiles. They used their proprietary liquidity cost scores (LCS) developed over a decade ago as a conservative estimate of transaction costs. LCS is a measure of bid-offer spread for trades in normal institutional size - QPS also used a proprietary trade efficiency score (TES) that combines LCS with trading volume to measure a bond’s tradability. TES represents a relative rank of bonds reflecting how tradable they are in the market. It is used to filter the index universe in a portfolio optimization and avoid buying bonds deemed less tradable. Historical analysis showed that all three signals remain effective across securities with different liquidity profiles.
Furthermore, Barclays QPS analyzed the market capacity of the strategy and found that the alpha the signals generated was maintained even for very large AUM.
One of the most important goals in our portfolio construction process is to generate alpha using systematic, signal-based holdings. We believe that quantitative signals can persistently identify outperformance opportunities in credit markets. We are using these signals, which pull information from both fixed income and equity data, to identify bonds that can generate excess return versus benchmarks.
Our capabilities as a large fixed income manager allow us to source bonds and efficiently build portfolios that maximize signal exposure, while investing in reasonably liquid securities and controlling trading costs. We combine the Barclays QPS research excellence with our practical portfolio sampling and implementation experience.
Important Risk Disclosure
For institutional / professional investors use only.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
Information Classification: General
All information is from SSGA unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
The views expressed are the views of Arkady Ho through August 7, 2023, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward- looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.
Bonds generally present less short-term risk and volatility than stocks, but contain interest rate risk (as interest rates raise, bond prices usually fall); issuer default risk; issuer credit risk; liquidity risk; and inflation risk. These effects are usually pronounced for longer-term securities. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to a substantial gain or loss.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
Barclays is not affiliated with State Street Global Advisors Funds Distributors, LLC.
Barclays Index License Disclaimer
Neither Barclays Bank PLC (“BB PLC”) nor any of its affiliates (collectively “Barclays”) is the issuer or producer of the products referenced herein and Barclays has no responsibilities, obligations or duties to investors in such products. The Barclays Indices referenced herein (collectively, the “Indices”), together with any Barclays indices that are components of such Indices, are trademarks owned by Barclays and, together with any component indices and index data, are licensed for use by State Street Global Advisors as the producer of the products referenced herein (the “Product Provider”). The Indices are used by the Product Provider in connection with the management of the products referenced herein, but the Indices are not used by the Product Provider as the benchmark for such products, as defined under Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds.
Barclays’ only relationship with the Product Provider in respect of the Indices is the licensing of the Indices, which are administered, compiled and published by BB PLC in its role as the index sponsor (the “Index Sponsor”) without regard to the Product Provider or the products referenced herein or investors in such products. Additionally, State Street Global Advisors as Product Provider may for itself execute transaction(s) with Barclays in or relating to the Indices in connection with such products. Investors acquire such products from the Product Provider and investors neither acquire any interest in the Indices nor enter into any relationship of any kind whatsoever with Barclays upon making an investment in such products. The products referenced herein are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Barclays and Barclays makes no representation regarding the advisability of such products or use of the Indices or any data included therein. Barclays shall not be liable in any way to the Product Provider, investors or to other third parties in respect of the use or accuracy of the Indices or any data included therein.
Barclays has engaged Bloomberg Index Services Limited as the official index calculation and maintenance agent of the Indices, which are owned and administered by Barclays. Bloomberg Index Services Limited does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness, or completeness of the calculations of the Indices or any data or information relating to the Indices. Bloomberg Index Services Limited makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the Indices or any data or values relating thereto or results to be obtained therefrom, and expressly disclaims all warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose with respect thereto. To the maximum extent allowed by law, Bloomberg Index Services Limited, its affiliates, and all of their respective partners, employees, subcontractors, agents, suppliers and vendors (collectively, the ‘protected parties’) shall have no liability or responsibility, contingent or otherwise, for any injury or damages, whether caused by the negligence of a protected party or otherwise, arising in connection with the calculation of the Indices or any data or values included therein or in connection therewith and shall not be liable for any lost profits, losses, punitive, incidental or consequential damages.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value and can decline significantly in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This communication is directed at professional clients (this includes eligible counterparties as defined by the appropriate EU regulator) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description (including retail clients) should not rely on this communication.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data.
© 2023 State Street Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Exp. Date: 10/31/2024