We review the main concerns and key market themes for Australian equities that investors should look out for over the year ahead.
Figure 1: S&P/ASX 300 Index – Earnings, Returns and Valuations
Source: Factset, as of 31 December 2022. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Index returns reflect capital gains and losses, income, and the reinvestment of dividends. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. EPS = Earnings Per Share. NTM = Next Twelve Months. STM = Second Twelve Months.
From a real-earnings perspective overall market valuations can still be considered rich due to the impact of high margins which is vulnerable to rising costs, especially labour expense. Consensus profit margin forecasts by and large have remained static and in many cases above pre-Covid norms. Based on falling Financial Conditions Indices, we can expect to see material declines in earnings as growth and profits are hit by the lagged effect of an aggressive tightening cycle.
Figure 2: Tightening Financial Conditions Lead Falling Earnings Growth
Source: Credit Suisse Equity Research. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Index returns reflect capital gains and losses, income, and the reinvestment of dividends. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses.
While some may say that a benchmark-relative approach is the best way to select and assess active equity managers, we believe investor objectives, not benchmarks, belong at the centre of portfolio construction. We define true success as not only producing “alpha”, but also managing total portfolio risk and we believe that managing volatility and reducing the impact of market losses will be key in 2023.
Investors who are invested in a benchmark-like Australian equity strategy should ask themselves – what is the key objective of my strategy? Is it aligned with getting exposure to the high cyclicality that is embedded in the Australian equity market?
As we enter 2023, the combination of higher rates and inflation is just beginning to impact consumers and borrowers, and we are likely to see further deterioration in discretionary expenditure during the year. This is likely to have flow through effects on credit growth and potentially asset quality of banks.
Being benchmark agnostic means that our approach explicitly ignores large index concentrations, and aim to hold more stable, higher quality and less cyclical companies in a way that minimizes overall portfolio volatility and drawdown risk.
While valuations for the big 4 banks remain undemanding and our model’s overall assessment of them varies between neutral to positive (NAB has the highest expected returns), that does not mean we hold the big 4 banks at anywhere near benchmark weights. Rather, our explicit focus on volatility management translates into a portfolio that is highly diversified across different stocks and sectors, with an emphasis placed on defensive names.
The same approach is applied to our holdings of Australian miners. BHP, for example, is an attractive stock from a fundamental perspective – with a strong balance sheet and a healthy portfolio mix of commodities. However, its cyclical nature is reflected in its higher earnings and price volatility means that BHP has a beta of 1.4. This cyclicality translates to a lower absolute weight in our defensive portfolio. Whilst the Fund has some cyclical exposures these are measured and are selective to those companies that help to offer the overall portfolio generate the best risk adjusted returns.
Our preferred defensives sectors are currently: 1) Communication Services 2) Food and Staples, and 3) Health Care. The relatively higher weights allocated to these sectors reflect our conviction that these high quality stocks will be able to produce higher earnings and share price resilience in an environment of lower growth and tight monetary policy.