Are you sure you want to change languages?
The page you are visiting uses a different locale than your saved profile. Do you want to change your locale?
Investors can seek to minimise the impact of capital gains taxes by choosing a tax-efficient investment product with low turnover, and a widely diversified underlying portfolio.
Among their many more obvious advantages — low cost, intraday liquidity, transparency and ease of use —ETFs are touted for their tax efficiency. (Note that tax efficiency refers to how well an investment minimises an investor’s taxes while they own it). ETFs typically generate fewer capital gains distributions than unlisted funds for two reasons:
1. Low turnover means a longer holding period for each of the underlying investments which creates the potential for lower capital gains distributions. By simple design, ETFs generally hold underlying securities longer than 12 months (at least), which qualifies for the long-term capital gains tax discount.
2. The second reason holding periods are important is the ’45-day rule’ – this is the length of time a security must be held around its ex-date for the investor to qualify for the franking credits.
The unique structure of ETFs can reduce capital gains distributions for tax-aware investors and allow for more assets to remain invested without the drag of ‘premature’ gain realisation — typically increasing the growth potential of the investment.
The dividend imputation system in Australia can represent an important advantage for investors over the dividend taxation schemes found in other countries because it largely eliminates the double taxation of corporate profits in Australia. If Australian corporate taxes have already been paid on profits used to fund dividends, those taxes need not be paid again at the personal level by investors.
The corporate taxes paid are attributed, or imputed, to the Australian investor through tax credits called franking credits. These franking credits can be used to reduce an investor’s total tax liability. For investors who are individuals or complying superannuation entities, any excess franking credits can also be refunded at the end of the year if the investor’s franking credits are greater than their tax liability.
Let’s look at an example. ABC Corporation makes $1.00 per share in pre-tax profit during a given period and would like to pay it all out in the form of dividends. After paying the 30% corporate tax, ABC Corporation distributes $0.70 per share in fully franked dividends. To the Australian investor, this is equivalent to being paid an unfranked, “grossed up” dividend of $1.00 per share. The 30% corporate taxes already paid will accompany the dividend in the form of a $0.30 per share franking credit and act similar to an “IOU” from the tax office.
From this we can see that:
Dividend + Franking Credit = Grossed Up Dividend
The taxpayer must now pay the appropriate level of tax on the grossed up dividend less any franking credit. In other words, the franking credit can be used to offset taxes due on the dividend (for 45% and 32.5% marginal tax rate investor) or entitle the investor to a tax refund (19% and 0% marginal tax rate investor). An investor with 0% taxes due will be entitled to receive the entire franking credit back as a tax refund. (Figure 1 below shows the example involving 100 shares of ABC Corporation).