Corporate DB Plans: Selectively Manage Risk and Adopt a More Defensive Playbook
The severity of the COVID-19 outbreak will continue to test markets. The recent US market drawdown stands out not only in terms of its absolute magnitude but also in terms of the speed at which it happened with the pandemic and an upended global energy economy serving as catalysts. Based on historic average monthly returns during sell-offs, the current drop is a clear outlier as moves of this magnitude and velocity were witnessed only during the downturn of 1987 and the crash of 1929. The pace is much more rapid than during the global financial crisis (GFC), when markets took 18 months to collapse from peak to trough. As we enter Q2 2020, we find many aspects of the investing world in conditions that have rarely been experienced, which continue to make liability and long-term investment based management a challenging exercise.
The S&P 500 Index plunged 32% in March as the longest bull market in history transitioned to a speedy bear market in just 16 trading days. As a result, volatility surged, and investors continued to seek liquidity for benefit payment outlays, rebalancing purposes and corporate finance cash needs. Whereas markets have sharply rebounded since the lows experienced in the middle of March, there has been very little faith in this rally as investors still lack clarity around the nature of the crisis vis-à-vis the duration and depth (eventual market bottom) of the sell-off. Although one can see across to the other side of the river, how deep the river itself is unclear (with respect to job losses, credit and earnings downgrades and defaults). While liquidity has improved due to unprecedented central bank and government interventions, it is too soon to call an all-clear on financial market functioning. Thus, economic forecasters and asset allocators are faced with two separate questions. The first question is about understanding how long the economic shutdown will last and how severe the immediate economic drag is going to be. The second one is regarding the time that would take before economic activity returns to normal. The answers on both fronts are challenging given lack of precedence. In this context, calling the absolute bottom is a fool’s errand as markets expect near-term volatility to continue.
As the current crisis continues to unfold, progress is made in combatting the virus and forthcoming economic data unfolds compared to what has been priced in, institutional investors may increasingly look at strategic ways of rebalancing or shifting their asset allocation in a gradual, cautious manner. Investors who have an intermediate to longer-term horizon may consider recent events as a buying opportunity. However, plan sponsors and investment committees need a strategy that is calibrated for the near-term environment of continued low interest rates and volatile risk asset markets. The high-quality nature of the discounting methodology for corporate defined benefit (DB) plan liabilities has meant that liability values have risen as risk assets, especially equities, have fallen. Wider credit spreads over the period dampened the blow, but falling Treasury rates and greater drops in equities meant assets did not keep pace with liabilities. This has translated into an erosion in funded status year to date with plans that are more heavily tilted toward return seeking assets (equities in our illustration below) seeing greater degradation.
In times of crisis and limited clarity, particularly during recessionary periods, the best course of action is to selectively manage risk and seek return using a more defensive playbook, across and within asset classes. A consistent theme across our asset allocation teams and our clients, both discretionary and non-discretionary, has been to seek capital efficiency within a fixed-income portfolio and risk efficiency within riskier, growth-oriented assets, notably, global equity allocations. This approach proved to serve clients well throughout the recent crisis. Lower-beta equities (low volatility, minimum volatility and defensive equity) have meaningfully outperformed their cap-weighted benchmarks in the recent sell-off. Capital-efficient fixed income, longer-dated US Treasuries/Treasury Strips or, in synthetic solutions, US Treasury futures have helped provide a buffer to the widening in investment grade credit spreads.
A Potential Path Forward
While the path forward is clearly horizon based and driven by liquidity needs as we confront the crisis in our midst, we believe there are several ways in which clients can incrementally modify their approach to rebalancing or adjusting asset allocation targets depending on the nature of their liabilities or spending commitments.
While most corporate pension plans have adopted a dynamic de-risking glide path approach to managing their strategic asset allocation target weights, there are plans that have yet to embrace this approach within their governance framework. Certain pension clients with a codified risk framework experienced benefits over the past 1-2 years, having reached the funded status de-risking trigger. These plans incrementally shifted assets from return-seeking to liability-based fixed income. We have also advised plans to shift a greater portion of their assets to lower-volatility equity within their return-seeking allocation to de-risk within this asset bucket. In addition, to efficiently use their fixed-income allocation, we have advised to either increase their asset-liability hedge ratio (adding duration) with longer-term Treasury, Strips or synthetically via Treasury futures or maintain their hedge ratio while shifting capital to higher-grade corporate bonds that align more closely with their pension liability discount rate.
While the equity market may face challenges ahead, clients who retain a cautious outlook but seek to take opportunities to reallocate within their return seeking assets, either strategically or tactically, could consider higher-quality, lower-beta equity strategies. Heading into a recession, experience shows that defensive and quality assets provide advantages – defensive (those with lower volatility and beta to the market) and higher-quality stocks (those with higher profit margins, lower leverage and more stable earnings) outperformed during the past three recessions. Value stocks have done well, too, especially during the 2001 tech bubble.
A similar approach could be taken within the fixed-income portfolio allocation – considering opportunities in IG credit spreads. Owing to the speed of the downturn, the IG market suffered a record pace of downgrades and whether this is a repeat of the 2008 GFC remains to be seen. IG spreads initially quadrupled to over 400 bp, well above the 250 bp levels typical of recessions, but aggressive Fed actions calmed the markets, and IG has since retraced one third of the sell-off. The effectiveness of the Fed’s actions is also being reflected in narrowing dealer bid-ask spreads, moderating bond outflows and new issuances. We are watchful about other areas of potential stress – for instance, IG downgrades into high yield (HY) in 2020. If actual downgrades end up being significantly greater, credit markets could face far more downsides. The funding facilities that the Fed has announced include short-dated IG debt and fallen angels, which should dampen the impact of downgrades to HY.
Now that both the USD and EUR credit markets have de facto become monetary policy tools, we think credit markets have greater level of support than during the depths of the GFC in 2008. Spread movements, while painful on current allocations, may be indicative of stabilization as spreads have not widened to levels seen in the GFC. To be clear, although credit valuations may remain in recession territory for the next two quarters as uncertainty related to the spread of the coronavirus persists, we think the potency of the policy support greatly limits the scope for credit spreads to revisit historic crisis levels.
For corporate pensions, the desire to minimize volatility, however, often clashed with a desire to maintain high levels of pension income. The most common objection against the ‘de-risking’ arguments was the opportunity cost of moving from equities to high-quality, long-duration bonds. The nature of the trade-off has changed in the current environment. Clients continue to face the prospect of meeting liability hurdles or spending policies and lower-volatility equity and yield related needs will drive capital into companies with strong dividends and a capacity to maintain higher-quality balance sheets and earnings profiles. We believe even modest allocation adjustments that seek quality and lower volatility within global equities and higher-quality IG US corporate fixed income could provide incremental risk-adjusted return benefits for longer-term investors.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses.
The views expressed in this material are the views of Thomas Coleman and Thomas Kennelly through the period ended April 24, 2020 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected.
All information is from State Street Global Advisors unless otherwise noted and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor.
Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal.
Equity securities may fluctuate in value in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions.
Bonds generally present less short-term risk and volatility than stocks, but contain interest rate risk (as interest rates raise, bond prices usually fall); issuer default risk; issuer credit risk; liquidity risk; and inflation risk. These effects are usually pronounced for longer-term securities. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to a substantial gain or loss.
The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data.
The information contained in this communication is not a research recommendation or ‘investment research’ and is classified as a ‘Marketing Communication’ in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2014/65/EU) or applicable Swiss regulation. This means that this marketing communication (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent.
Issued by State Street Global Advisors, Australia Services Limited (AFSL Number 274900, ABN 16 108 671 441) ("SSGA, ASL"). Registered office: Level 14, 420 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia · Telephone: 612 9240-7600 · Web: www.ssga.com.
State Street Global Advisors, Australia Services Limited (ASL) (AFSL Number 274900, ABN 16 108 671 441) is the issuer of interests and the Responsible Entity for the ETFs which are Australian registered managed investment schemes quoted on the AQUA market of the ASX or listed on the ASX. This material is general information only and does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs and you should consider whether it is appropriate for you. You should seek professional advice and consider the product disclosure document, available at www.ssga.com/au, before deciding whether to acquire or continue to hold units in an ETF. This material should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell a security. ETFs trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk, fluctuate in market value and may trade at prices above or below the ETF's net asset value. ETFs typically invest by sampling an index, holding a range of securities that, in the aggregate, approximates the full index in terms of key risk factors and other characteristics. This may cause the fund to experience tracking errors relative to performance of the index. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Holdings and sectors shown are as of the date indicated and are subject to change. This information should not be considered a recommendation to invest in a particular sector or to buy or sell any security shown. It is not known whether the sectors or securities shown will be profitable in the future. Sector ETF products are also subject to sector risk and non-diversification risk, which generally results in greater price fluctuations than the overall market. SPDR and Standard & Poor's® S&P® indices are trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and have been licensed for use by State Street Corporation. The Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and has been licensed for use by State Street Global Advisors, ASL. MSCI indices, the property of MSCI, Inc. ("MSCI"), and ASX®, a registered trademark of ASX Operations Pty Limited, have been licensed for use by State Street Global Advisors, ASL. SPDR products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by any of these entities and none of these entities bear any liability with respect to the ETFs or make any representation, warranty or condition regarding the advisability of buying, selling or holding units in the ETFs issued by State Street Global Advisors, ASL. State Street Global Advisors Trust Company (ARBN 619 273 817) is the trustee of, and the issuer of interests in, the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, an ETF registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and principally listed and traded on NYSE Arca, Inc. under the symbol "SPY". State Street Global Advisors, ASL is the AQUA Product Issuer for the CHESS Depositary Interests (or "CDIs") which have been created over units in SPY and are quoted on the AQUA market of the ASX. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without State Street Global Advisors, ASL's express written consent.